PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: Very high Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
[parent] alternative definition of valuation (Definition)

One may use a slightly different version of the third criterion to define a slightly more general definition of valuation.

A valuation on a field $\mathbb{K}$ is a map $| \cdot | \colon \mathbb{K} \to \mathbb{R}$ such that

  1. $|x| = 0$ if an only if $x = 0$
  2. $|xy| = |x| \, |y|$
  3. $|x + y| \le C \max \{ |x|, |y| \}$
The quantity $C$ which appears in the third criterion is a positive real number which is known as the constant of the valuation.

There is some flexibility in the choice of the constant $C$ in this definition -- one can replace $C$ by a larger number $C'$ . To deal with this ambiguity, one defines the norm of the valuation as $$\inf \{ C \mid (\forall x) (\forall y) \> |x + y| < C \max \{ |x|, |y| \} \}$$

The relation of this definition to the usual one is the following. On the one hand, if $| \cdot |$ satisfies the usual definition, then $$|x + y| \le |x| + |y| \le 2 \max \{ |x|, |y| \}$$ so a valuation in the old sense is a valuation in the new sense with constant 2.

On the other hand, suppose that $| \cdot |$ satisfies the alternative definition with constant $C < 2$ . Then we have the following result.

Theorem If $| \cdot |$ is a valuation according to the definition of this entry with constant $C \le 2$ , then $| \cdot |$ satisfies the identity $$| x + y | \le |x| + |y|.$$

The proof of this assertion is given in a supplement to this entry.

The foregoing discussion shows that the new definition is more general than the old definition precisely when $C > 2$ . However, this extra generalty is not as great as it might seem at first sight. As is obvious from examining the definition, if $| \cdot |$ is a valuation, then so is $| \cdot |^p$ for any power $p > 0$ . Furthermore, if the valuation has constant $C$ , then valuation $| \cdot |^p$ has constant $C^p$ . Therefore, given any valuation $| \cdot |$ in the sense of this entry, there will exist a number $p$ such that $| \cdot |^p$ is a valuation in the sense of the parent entry. Moreover, given the fact that two valuations which are powers of each other are equivalent, one sees that the extra generality is not that interesting since the new valuations are equivalent to the old valuations.




"alternative definition of valuation" is owned by rspuzio.
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:


This object's parent.

Attachments:
proof of equivalence of definitions of valuation (Proof) by rspuzio
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: equivalent, parent, obvious, supplement, proof, identity, theorem, relation, number, real number, positive, map, field, valuation

This is version 4 of alternative definition of valuation, born on 2005-01-04, modified 2005-01-06.
Object id is 6618, canonical name is AlternativeDefinitionOfValuation.
Accessed 1927 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC11R99 (Number theory :: Algebraic number theory: global fields :: Miscellaneous)
 12J20 (Field theory and polynomials :: Topological fields :: General valuation theory)
 13A18 (Commutative rings and algebras :: General commutative ring theory :: Valuations and their generalizations)
 13F30 (Commutative rings and algebras :: Arithmetic rings and other special rings :: Valuation rings)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy

No messages.

Interact
post | correct | update request | add derivation | add example | add (any)