PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: High Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
[parent] compactness and accumulation points of nets (Theorem)
Theorem   A topological space $X$ is compact if and only if every net in $X$ has an accumulation point.
Proof. Suppose $X$ is compact and let $(x_\alpha)_{\alpha\in A}$ be a net in $X$ . For each $\alpha\in A$ , put $E_\alpha=\set{x_\beta:\beta\geq\alpha}$ ; the collection $\set{\overline{E_\alpha}:\alpha\in A}$ of closed subsets of $X$ has the finite intersection property, for given $\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_n\in A$ , because $A$ is directed, there exists $\beta\in A$ satisfying $\beta\geq\alpha_i$ for each $i\in\set{1,\ldots,n}$ , so that $x_\beta\in\bigcap_{i=1}^n\overline{E_{\alpha_i}}$ . Therefore, by compactness, $\bigcap_{\alpha\in A}\overline{E_\alpha}\neq\emptyset$ ; let $x$ be a point of this intersection. If $U$ is any open subset of $X$ and $\alpha\in A$ , then because $x\in\overline{E_\alpha}$ , $E_\alpha\cap U\neq\emptyset$ , and thus there exists $\beta\geq\alpha\in A$ for which $x_\beta\in U$ . It follows that $x$ is an accumulation point of $(x_\alpha)$ . For the converse, assume that $X$ fails to be compact, and let $\set{U_i:i\in I}$ be an open cover of $X$ with no finite subcover. If $B$ is the set of finite subsets of $I$ , then $B$ is directed by inclusion. For each set $S\in B$ , let $x_S$ be a point in the complement of $\bigcup_{i\in S}U_i$ . We contend that the net $(x_S)_{S\in B}$ has no accumulation points; indeed, given $x\in X$ , we may select $i_0\in I$ such that $x\in U_{i_0}$ ; if $S\in B$ is such that $i_0\in S$ , that is, if $S\geq\set{i_0}$ , then by construction, $x_S\notin U_{i_0}$ , establishing our contention. $ \qedsymbol$
Corollary   The following conditions on a topological space $X$ are equivalent:
  1. $X$ is compact;
  2. every net in $X$ has an accumulation point;
  3. every net in $X$ has a convergent subnet;
Proof. The preceding theorem establishes the equivalence of (1) and (2), while that of (2) and (3) is established in the entry on accumulation points and convergent subnets. $ \qedsymbol$




"compactness and accumulation points of nets" is owned by azdbacks4234.
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:

See Also: net, compact, accumulation points and convergent subnets

Keywords:  net, compact, subnet, accumulation point, cluster point

This object's parent.
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: accumulation points and convergent subnets, equivalence, theorem, subnet, convergent, equivalent, complement, inclusion, subsets, subcover, finite, open cover, converse, open subset, intersection, point, compactness, finite intersection property, closed subsets, collection, accumulation point, net, compact, topological space
There is 1 reference to this entry.

This is version 4 of compactness and accumulation points of nets, born on 2008-12-22, modified 2008-12-22.
Object id is 11368, canonical name is CompactnessAndConvergentSubnets.
Accessed 335 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC54A20 (General topology :: Generalities :: Convergence in general topology )

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy

No messages.

Interact
post | correct | update request | prove | add result | add corollary | add example | add (any)