A contradiction occurs when the statements $p$ and $\neg p$ are shown to be true simultaneously. This concept appears most often in a proof by contradiction (also known as reductio ad absurdum), which is proving a statement by supposing its negation is true and logically deducing an absurd statement. That is, in attempting to prove $q$ , one may assume $\neg q$ and attempt to obtain a statement of the form $\neg r$ , where $r$ is a statement that is assumed or known to be true.

Proofs by contradiction can become confusing. This is especially the case when such proofs are nested; i.e., a proof by contradiction occurs within a proof by contradiction. Some mathematicians prefer to use a direct proof whenever possible, as such arguments are easier to follow in general. A small minority of mathematicians go so far as to reject proof by contradiction as a valid proof technique. It should be pointed out that something good can be said for proof by contradiction: If one wants to prove a statement of the form $p \implies q$ , using the technique of proof by contradiction gives an additional hypothesis with which to work.