|
|
|
|
counter-example to Tonelli's theorem
|
(Example)
|
|
|
The following observation demonstrates the necessity of the $\sigma$ -finite assumption in Tonelli's and Fubini's theorem. Let $X$ denote the closed unit interval $[0,1]$ equipped with Lebesgue measure and $Y$ the same set, but this time equipped with counting measure $\nu$ . Let
Observe that$$ \int_Y \left( \int_X f(x,y) d\mu(x)\right) d\nu(y) = 0$$ while$$ \int_X \left( \int_Y f(x,y) d\nu(y)\right) d\mu(x) = 1$$ The iterated integrals do not give the same value, this despite the fact that the integrand is a non-negative function.
Also observe that there does not exist a simple function on $X\times Y$ that is dominated by $f$ . Hence,$$ \int_{X\times Y} f(x,y) d (\mu(x)\times \nu(y) = 0$$ Therefore, the integrand is $L^1$ integrable relative to the product measure. However, as we observed above, the iterated integrals do not agree. This observation illustrates the need for the $\sigma$ -finite assumption for Fubini's theorem.
|
Anyone with an account can edit this entry. Please help improve it!
"counter-example to Tonelli's theorem" is owned by rmilson.
|
|
(view preamble | get metadata)
Cross-references: product measure, simple function, function, integrand, iterated integrals, counting measure, Lebesgue measure, interval, unit, closed, Fubini's theorem, necessity
This is version 1 of counter-example to Tonelli's theorem, born on 2008-07-27.
Object id is 10882, canonical name is CounterExampleToTonellisTheorem.
Accessed 892 times total.
Classification:
| AMS MSC: | 28A35 (Measure and integration :: Classical measure theory :: Measures and integrals in product spaces) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pending Errata and Addenda
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|