PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: Very high Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
[parent] determining the continuations of exponent (Example)

Task. Let $\nu_0$ be the 3-adic (triadic) exponent valuation of the field $\mathbb{Q}$ of the rational numbers and let $\mathfrak{o}$ be the ring of the exponent. Determine the integral closure $\mathfrak{O}$ of $\mathfrak{o}$ in the extension field $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-5})$ and the continuations of $\nu_0$ to this field.

The triadic exponent of $\mathbb{Q}$ at any non-zero rational number $\displaystyle\frac{3^nu}{v}$ , where $u$ and $v$ are integers not divisible by 3, is defined as $$\nu_0\left(\frac{3^nu}{v}\right) \,:=\, n.$$ Any number of the quadratic field $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-5})$ is of the form $$r+s\sqrt{-5}$$ with $r$ and $s$ rational numbers. When $\alpha = r+s\sqrt{-5}$ belongs to $\mathfrak{O}$ , the rational coefficients of the quadratic equation $$x^2-2rx+(r^2+5s^2) = 0,$$ satisfied by $\alpha$ , belong to the ring $\mathfrak{o}$ , whence one has $$\nu_0(-2r) \geqq 0, \quad \nu_0(r^2+5c^2) \geqq 0.$$ The first of these inequalities implies that $\nu_0(r) \geqq 0$ since $-2$ is a unit of $\mathfrak{o}$ . As for $s$ , if one had $\nu_0(s) < 0$ , then $\nu_0(5s^2) = 2\nu_0(s) < 0$ , and therefore one had $$\nu_0(r^2+5s^2) \;=\; \min\{\nu_0(r^2),\,\nu_0(5s^2)\} < 0.$$ Thus we have to have $\nu_0(s) \geqq 0$ , too. So we have seen that for $r+s\sqrt{-5} \in \mathfrak{O}$ , it's necessary that $r,\,s \in \mathfrak{o}$ . The last condition is, apparently, also sufficient. Accordingly, we have obtained the result $$\mathfrak{O} = \{r\!+\!s\sqrt{-5}\,\vdots\;\;\; r,\,s \in \mathfrak{o}\}.$$

Since the degree of the field extension $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-5})/\mathbb{Q}$ is 2, the exponent $\nu_0$ has, by the theorem in the parent entry, at most two continuations to $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-5})$ . Moreover, the same entry implies that the intersection of the rings of those continuations coincides with $\mathfrak{O}$ , whose non-associated prime elements determine the continuations in question.

We will show that there are exactly two of those continuations and that one may choose e.g. the conjugate numbers $$\pi_1 := 1+\sqrt{-5}, \quad \pi_2 := 1-\sqrt{-5}$$ for such prime elements.

Suppose that $\pi_1$ splits in $\mathfrak{O}$ into factors as $$\pi_1 = \alpha\beta$$ where $\alpha = a_0+a_1\sqrt{-1}$ , $\beta = b_0+b_1\sqrt{-5}$ ($a_i,\,b_i \in \mathfrak{o}$ ). Then also $$\pi_2 = \alpha'\beta'$$ where $\alpha' = a_0-a_1\sqrt{-1}$ , $\beta' = b_0-b_1\sqrt{-5}$ . We perceive that $$\pi_1\pi_2 = 6 = \alpha\alpha' \cdot \beta\beta' = (a_0^2+5a_1^2)(b_0^2+5b_1^2),$$ but according to the entry ring of exponent, the only prime numbers of $\mathfrak{o}$ are the associates of 3. Now we have factorised the prime number $6$ of $\mathfrak{o}$ into a product of two factors $\alpha\alpha'$ and $\beta\beta'$ , and consequently, e.g. $\alpha\alpha'$ is a unit of $\mathfrak{o}$ and hence of $\mathfrak{O}$ , too. Thus $\alpha$ and $\alpha'$ are units of $\mathfrak{O}$ , which means that $\pi_1$ and $\pi_2$ have only trivial factors. The numbers $\pi_1$ and $\pi_2$ themselves are not units, because $\frac{1}{1\pm\sqrt{-5}} = \frac{1}{6}\mp\frac{1}{6}\sqrt{-5} \not\in \mathfrak{O}$ ; $\pi_1$ and $\pi_2$ are not associates of each other, since $\frac{\pi_1}{\pi_2} = 1+\frac{1}{3}\sqrt{-5} \not\in \mathfrak{O}$ . So $\pi_1$ and $\pi_2$ are non-associated prime elements of $\mathfrak{O}$ . This ring has no other prime elements non-associated with both $\pi_1$ and $\pi_2$ , because otherwise $\nu_0$ would have more than two continuations.

According to the entry ring of exponent, any non-zero element of the field $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-5})$ is uniquely expressible in the form $$\xi = \varepsilon\pi_1^m\pi_2^n,$$ with $\varepsilon$ a unit of $\mathfrak{O}$ and $m,\,n$ integers. The both continuations $\nu_1$ and $\nu_2$ of the triadic exponent $\nu_0$ are then determined as follows: $$\nu_1(\xi) = m, \quad \nu_2(\xi) = n.$$




"determining the continuations of exponent" is owned by pahio.
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:

See Also: example of ring which is not a UFD


This object's parent.
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: factors, product, associates, prime numbers, ring of exponent, conjugate, prime elements, intersection, theorem, field extension, sufficient, necessary, unit, implies, inequalities, ring, quadratic equation, coefficients, rational, quadratic field, number, divisible, integers, rational number, continuations, extension field, integral closure, ring of the exponent, rational numbers, field, exponent valuation

This is version 4 of determining the continuations of exponent, born on 2008-04-20, modified 2008-04-20.
Object id is 10518, canonical name is DeterminingTheContinuationsOfExponent.
Accessed 432 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC11R99 (Number theory :: Algebraic number theory: global fields :: Miscellaneous)
 12J20 (Field theory and polynomials :: Topological fields :: General valuation theory)
 13A18 (Commutative rings and algebras :: General commutative ring theory :: Valuations and their generalizations)
 13F30 (Commutative rings and algebras :: Arithmetic rings and other special rings :: Valuation rings)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy

No messages.

Interact
post | correct | update request | add example | add (any)