PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: High Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
[parent] Hankel contour integral (Result)

Hankel's contour integral is a unit (and nilpotent) for gamma function over $\mathbb{C}$ That is, $$\left(\frac{i}{2\pi}\int_\mathcal{C}(-t)^{-z}e^{-t}dt\right)\Gamma(z)=1, \qquad |z|<\infty.$$ Hankel's integral is holomorphic with simple zeros in $\mathbb{Z}_{\leq 0}$ Its path of integration starts on the positive real axis ad infinitum, rounds the origin counterclockwise and returns to $+\infty$ As an example of application of Hankel's integral, we have $$\frac{i}{2\pi}\int_\mathcal{C}(-t)^{-\frac{1}{2}}e^{-t}dt=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}}\,,$$ where the path of integration is the one above mentioned.




"Hankel contour integral" is owned by perucho.
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:


This object's parent.
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: application, origin, ad infinitum, real axis, positive, path, simple, holomorphic, integral, gamma function, nilpotent, unit

This is version 2 of Hankel contour integral, born on 2007-08-09, modified 2007-08-11.
Object id is 9847, canonical name is HankelContourIntegral.
Accessed 1650 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC33B15 (Special functions :: Elementary classical functions :: Gamma, beta and polygamma functions)
 30D30 (Functions of a complex variable :: Entire and meromorphic functions, and related topics :: Meromorphic functions, general theory)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy
Help with the proof of Hnakel's contour integral by titina on 2008-11-30 18:29:28
Hello, I was wondering if you have a proof of the Hankel's contour integral. In the web I found one using the theory of Laplace transforms, but the book that is recommended for the subject that I am taking, have a lists of steps to proof the formula.
1st is to proof that the integral in the formula is entire
2nd is estimate the integral to see that improper integral converges uniformly to later say that the Hankel integral is an entire function.
3rd Use Cauchy's Theorem to proof that the values is independent from z and the radio of the circle (in the Hankel's contour)
then use that arg(-t)=-\pi in the upper side of the real axis and \pi in the other side. See that the radio is going to zero and use the Identity theorem to conclude that have sense that the formulas are the same in both sides in z~=0,1,2,...
I really need help please... I need som explanation of this steps or another proof.
[ reply | up ]

Interact
post | correct | update request | add example | add (any)