PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: Very high Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
[parent] proof of Pascal's mystic hexagram (Proof)

We can choose homogeneous coordinates $(x,y,z)$ such that the equation of the given nonsingular conic is $yz+zx+xy=0$ , or equivalently \begin{equation} \label{eq:conic} z(x+y)=-xy \end{equation}and the vertices of the given hexagram $A_1A_5A_3A_4A_2A_6$ are

$A_1=(x_1,y_1,z_1)$ $A_4=(1,0,0)$
$A_2=(x_2,y_2,z_2)$ $A_5=(0,1,0)$
$A_3=(x_3,y_3,z_3)$ $A_6=(0,0,1)$
(see Remarks below). The equations of the six sides, arranged in opposite pairs, are then
$A_1A_5: x_1z=z_1x$ $A_4A_2: y_2z=z_2y$
$A_5A_3: x_3z=z_3x$ $A_2A_6: y_2x=x_2y$
$A_3A_4: z_3y=y_3z$ $A_6A_1: y_1x=x_1y$
and the three points of intersection of pairs of opposite sides are $$A_1A_5\cdot A_4A_2 = (x_1z_2,z_1y_2,z_1z_2)$$ $$A_5A_3\cdot A_2A_6 = (x_2x_3,y_2x_3,x_2z_3)$$ $$A_3A_4\cdot A_6A_1 = (y_3x_1,y_3y_1,z_3y_1)$$ To say that these are collinear is to say that the determinant

$\displaystyle D=\left\vert \begin{array}{ccc} x_1z_2 & z_1y_2 & z_1z_2 \ x_2x_3 & y_2x_3 & x_2z_3 \ y_3x_1 & y_3y_1 & z_3y_1 \end{array}\right\vert $
is zero. We have
$D=$ $x_1y_1y_2z_2z_3x_3-x_1y_1z_2x_2y_3z_3$
  $+z_1x_1x_2y_2y_3z_3-y_1z_1x_2y_2z_3x_3$
  $+y_1z_1z_2x_2x_3y_3-z_1x_1y_2z_2x_3y_3$
Using ([*]) we get $$(x_1+y_1)(x_2+y_2)(x_3+y_3)D=x_1y_1x_2y_2x_3y_3S$$ where $(x_1+y_1)(x_2+y_2)(x_3+y_3)\ne 0$ and \begin{eqnarray*} S&= &(x_1+y_1)(y_2x_3-x_2y_3) \\ & +&(x_2+y_2)(y_3x_1-x_3y_1) \\ & +&(x_3+y_3)(y_1x_2-x_1y_2) \\ &= &0 \end{eqnarray*}QED.

Remarks:For more on the use of coordinates in a projective plane, see e.g. Hirst (an 11-page PDF).

A synthetic proof (without coordinates) of Pascal's theorem is possible with the aid of cross ratios or the related notion of harmonic sets (of four collinear points).

Pascal's proof is lost; presumably he had only the real affine plane in mind. A proof restricted to that case, based on Menelaus's theorem, can be seen at cut-the-knot.org.




"proof of Pascal's mystic hexagram" is owned by mathcam. [ full author list (2) | owner history (1) ]
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:


This object's parent.
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: Menelaus' theorem, affine plane, real, harmonic, Pascal's theorem, proof, projective plane, coordinates, QED, determinant, collinear, opposite sides, intersection, points, sides, conic, nonsingular, equation, homogeneous coordinates

This is version 2 of proof of Pascal's mystic hexagram, born on 2003-08-20, modified 2006-08-17.
Object id is 4627, canonical name is ProofOfPascalsMysticHexagram.
Accessed 3880 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC51A05 (Geometry :: Linear incidence geometry :: General theory and projective geometries)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy

No messages.

Interact
post | correct | update request | add example | add (any)