PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: High Entry average rating: High
union (Definition)

The union of two sets $A$ and $B$ is the set which contains all $x \in A$ and all $x \in B$ , denoted $A \cup B$ . In the Venn diagram below, $A\cup B$ is the entire area shaded in blue.


\begin{pspicture*}(0,0)(6,4) \pscircle[fillstyle=vlines,hatchcolor=blue,hatchwid... ...rput(1,2){$A$} \rput(5,2){$B$} \rput(-1,0){$.$} \rput(7,4){$.$} \end{pspicture*}

We can extend this to any (finite or infinite) family $ (A_i)_{i\in I}$, writing $ \bigcup_{i\in I}A_i$ for the union of this family. Formally, for a family $ (A_i)_{i\in I}$ of sets:

$\displaystyle x \in \bigcup_{i\in I}A_i\; \Leftrightarrow \;\bigvee_{i\in I}\, (x\in A_i) $
Alternatively, and equivalently,

$\displaystyle x \in \bigcup_{i\in I}A_i\; \Leftrightarrow \;\exists i\in I$ such that $\displaystyle x\in A_ $
This characterization makes it much clearer that if $ I$ is itself the empty set (that is, if we are taking the union of an empty family), then the union is empty; that is,

$\displaystyle \bigcup_{i\in\emptyset}A_i=\emptyse $

Often elements of sets are taken from some universe $ U$ of elements under consideration (for example, the real numbers $ \mathbb{R}$, or living things on the planet, or words in a particular book). When this is the case, it is meaningful to discuss the complement of a set: if $ A$ is a set of elements from some universe $ U$, then the complement of $ A$ is the set

$\displaystyle A^C = U\backslash A= \{x\in U\ \mid\ x\notin A\ $

From an axiomatic point of view, the existence of the union is guaranteed by the axiom of union.

Note that the sets $ A_i$ may be, but need not be, disjoint. Unions satisfy some basic properties that are obvious from the definitions:

Here are some examples of set unions:

$\displaystyle \{1,2\}\cup\{3,4\} = \{1,2,3,4\}$    
$\displaystyle \{blue, green\}\cup\emptyset = \{blue, green\}$    
$\displaystyle \{x\in\mathbb{Z}\ \mid\ x\geqslant 1\}\cup\{x\in\mathbb{Z}\ \mid\ x\leqslant -1\} = \{x\in\mathbb{Z}\ \mid\ x\neq 0\}$    
$\displaystyle \{1,2\}\cup\{1,4\} = \{1,2,4\}$    
$\displaystyle \{x\in\mathbb{R}\ \mid\ x\geqslant 2\}\cup\{x\in\mathbb{R}\ \mid\ x\leqslant 2\} = \mathbb{R}$    
$\displaystyle \bigcup_{\substack{n\in\mathbb{Z}\\ n>0}} \left\{\frac{p}{n}\,\mid\,p\in\mathbb{Z}\right\} = \mathbb{Q}$    

The first three of these are the union of disjoint sets, while the latter three are not - in those cases, the sets overlap each other.




"union" is owned by rm50. [ full author list (3) | owner history (2) ]
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:

See Also: intersection

Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: associativity, commutativity, idempotency, definitions, obvious, properties, satisfy, disjoint, point, axiomatic, complement, real numbers, universe, empty set, characterization, infinite, finite, Venn diagram, contains
There are 199 references to this entry.

This is version 9 of union, born on 2002-01-26, modified 2008-11-29.
Object id is 1619, canonical name is Union.
Accessed 13079 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC03E30 (Mathematical logic and foundations :: Set theory :: Axiomatics of classical set theory and its fragments)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
[ View all 6 ]
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy

No messages.

Interact
post | correct | update request | add derivation | add example | add (any)