PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Revision difference : tight
Version 2 Version 1
A bound is \emph{tight} if it can be realized. A bound that is not A bound is \emph{tight} if it can be realized. A bound that is not
tight is sometimes said to be \emph{slack}. tight is sometimes said to be \emph{slack}.
For example, let $\mathcal{S}$ be the collection of all finite subsets For example, let $\mathcal{S}$ be the collection of all finite subsets
of $\mathbb{R}^2$ in general position. Define a function of $\mathbb{R}^2$ in general position. Define a function
$g\colon\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}$ as follows. First, let the weight of $g\colon\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}$ as follows. First, let the weight of
an element of $\mathcal{S}$ be the size of its largest convex subset, an element of $\mathcal{S}$ be the size of its largest convex subset,
that is, that is,
\[ \[
w(S) = \max \{ |T| \colon T\subset S\text{\ and $T$ is convex} \}. w(S) = \max \{ |T| \colon T\subset S\text{\ and $T$ is convex} \}.
\] \]
The function $g$ is defined by The function $g$ is defined by
\[ \[
g(n) = \min_{S\in w^{-1}(n)} |S|, g(n) = \min_{S\in w^{-1}(n)} |S|,
\] \]
that is, $g(n)$ is the smallest number such that any collection of that is, $g(n)$ is the smallest number such that any collection of
$g(n)$ points in general position contains a convex $n$-gon. (By the $g(n)$ points in general position contains a convex $n$-gon. (By the
\PMlinkname{Erd\H{o}s-Szekeres theorem}{HappyEndingProblem}, $g(n)$ is Erd\H{o}s-Szekeres theorem, $g(n)$ is always finite, so $g$ is a
always finite, so $g$ is a well-defined function.) The bounds for $g$ well-defined function.) The bounds for $g$ due to Erd\H{o}s and
due to Erd\H{o}s and Szekeres are Szekeres are
\[ \[
2^{n-2} + 1\le g(n) \le \binom{2n-4}{n-2} + 1. 2^{n-2} + 1\le g(n) \le \binom{2n-4}{n-2} + 1.
\] \]
The lower bound is tight because for each $n$, there is a set of The lower bound is tight because for each $n$, there is a set of
$2^{n-2}$ points in general position which contains no convex $n$-gon. $2^{n-2}$ points in general position which contains no convex $n$-gon.
On the other hand, the upper bound is believed to be slack. In fact, On the other hand, the upper bound is believed to be slack. In fact,
according to the Erd\H{o}s-Szekeres conjecture, the formula for $g(n)$ according to the Erd\H{o}s-Szekeres conjecture, the formula for $g(n)$
is exactly the lower bound: $g(n) = 2^{n-2} + 1$. is exactly the lower bound: $g(n) = 2^{n-2} + 1$.
\PMlinkescapeword{bound} \PMlinkescapeword{bound}
\PMlinkescapeword{bounds} \PMlinkescapeword{bounds}
\PMlinkescapeword{size} \PMlinkescapeword{size}
\PMlinkescapeword{weight} \PMlinkescapeword{weight}