PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Revision difference : converse
Version 11 Version 10
\PMlinkescapeword{congruent} \PMlinkescapeword{congruent}
\PMlinkescapeword{contains} \PMlinkescapeword{contains}
\PMlinkescapeword{words} \PMlinkescapeword{words}
Let a statement be of the form of an implication Let a statement be of the form of an implication
$$\mbox{If } p, \mbox{ then } q$$ $$\mbox{If } p, \mbox{ then } q$$
\PMlinkname{i.e.}{Ie} it has a certain premise $p$ and a conclusion $q$. The statement in which one has interchanged the conclusion and the premise, \PMlinkname{i.e.}{Ie} it has a certain premise $p$ and a conclusion $q$. The statement in which one has interchanged the conclusion and the premise,
$$\mbox{If } q, \mbox{ then } p$$ $$\mbox{If } q, \mbox{ then } p$$
is the {\em converse} of the first. In other words, from the former one concludes that $q$ is necessary for $p$, and from the latter that $p$ is necessary for $q$. is the {\em converse} of the first. In other words, from the former one concludes that $q$ is necessary for $p$, and from the latter that $p$ is necessary for $q$.
Note that the converse of an implication and the inverse of the same implication are contrapositives of each other and thus are logically equivalent.
If the original statement is a theorem that is known to be true, then its converse is the \emph{converse theorem} of the original statement. Note that, if the converse theorem of a true theorem ``If $p$, then $q$'' is also true, then ``$p$ iff $q$'' is a true theorem. \\ If the original statement is a theorem that is known to be true, then its converse is the \emph{converse theorem} of the original statement. Note that, if the converse theorem of a true theorem ``If $p$, then $q$'' is also true, then ``$p$ iff $q$'' is a true theorem. \\
For example, we know the theorem on isosceles triangles: For example, we know the theorem on isosceles triangles:
{\em If a triangle contains two \PMlinkname{congruent}{Congruent2} sides, then it has two congruent angles.} {\em If a triangle contains two \PMlinkname{congruent}{Congruent2} sides, then it has two congruent angles.}
There is also its converse theorem: There is also its converse theorem:
{\em If a triangle contains two congruent angles, then it has two congruent sides.} {\em If a triangle contains two congruent angles, then it has two congruent sides.}
Both of these theorems are true (see the entries angles of an isosceles triangle and determining from angles that a triangle is isosceles, respectively). But there are many true theorems whose converse theorem is not true, \PMlinkname{e.g.}{Eg}: Both of these theorems are true (see the entries angles of an isosceles triangle and determining from angles that a triangle is isosceles, respectively). But there are many true theorems whose converse theorem is not true, \PMlinkname{e.g.}{Eg}:
{\em If a function is differentiable on an interval $I$, then it is continuous on $I$.} {\em If a function is differentiable on an interval $I$, then it is continuous on $I$.}