PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Revision difference : Noetherian module
Version 18 Version 17
\PMlinkescapeword{equivalent} \PMlinkescapeword{equivalent}
\PMlinkescapephrase{generated by} \PMlinkescapephrase{generated by}
\PMlinkescapeword{left} \PMlinkescapeword{left}
\PMlinkescapephrase{left noetherian} \PMlinkescapephrase{left noetherian}
\PMlinkescapeword{property} \PMlinkescapeword{property}
\PMlinkescapeword{right} \PMlinkescapeword{right}
\PMlinkescapephrase{right noetherian} \PMlinkescapephrase{right noetherian}
\PMlinkescapeword{similar} \PMlinkescapeword{similar}
\PMlinkescapeword{simple} \PMlinkescapeword{simple}
A (left or right) module $M$ over a ring $R$ is said to be \emph{Noetherian} A (left or right) module $M$ over $R$ is said to be \emph{Noetherian}
if the following equivalent conditions hold: if the following equivalent conditions hold:
\begin{enumerate} \begin{enumerate}
\item Every submodule of $M$ is finitely generated over $R$. \item Every submodule of $M$ is finitely generated over $R$.
\item The ascending chain condition holds on submodules. \item The ascending chain condition holds on submodules.
\item Every nonempty family of submodules has a maximal element. \item Every nonempty family of submodules has a maximal element.
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}
For example, the $\mathbb{Z}$-module $\mathbb{Q}$ is not Noetherian, For example the $\mathbb{Z}$-module $\mathbb{Q}$ is not Noetherian,
as it is not finitely generated, as it is not finitely generated,
but the $\mathbb{Z}$-module $\mathbb{Z}$ is Noetherian, but the $\mathbb{Z}$-module $\mathbb{Z}$ is Noetherian,
as every submodule is generated by a single element. as every submodule is generated by a single element.
Observe that changing the ring can change whether a module is Noetherian or not: Observe that changing the ring can change whether a module is Noetherian or not:
for example, the $\mathbb{Q}$-module $\mathbb{Q}$ is Noetherian, for example, the $\mathbb{Q}$-module $\mathbb{Q}$ is Noetherian,
since it is \PMlinkname{simple}{SimpleModule} since it is \PMlinkname{simple}{SimpleModule}
(has no nontrivial submodules). (has no nontrivial submodules).
There is also a notion of \PMlinkname{Noetherian for rings}{Noetherian}: There is also a notion of \PMlinkname{Noetherian for rings}{Noetherian}:
a ring is left Noetherian if it is Noetherian as a left module over itself, a ring is left Noetherian if it is Noetherian as a left module over itself,
and right Noetherian if it is Noetherian as a right module over itself. and right Noetherian if it is Noetherian as a right module over itself.
For non-commutative rings, these two notions can differ. For non-commutative rings, these two notions can differ.
The corresponding property for groups is usually called the maximal condition. The corresponding property for groups is usually called the maximal condition.
Finally, there is the somewhat related notion of a Finally, there is the somewhat related notion of a
\PMlinkname{Noetherian topological space}{NoetherianTopologicalSpace}. \PMlinkname{Noetherian topological space}{NoetherianTopologicalSpace}.