PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Revision difference : nested interval theorem
Version 3 Version 2
If If
$$[a_1,\,b_1]\;\supseteq [a_2,\,b_2]\;\supseteq [a_3,\,b_3]\;\supseteq\ldots$$ $$[a_1,\,b_1]\;\supseteq [a_2,\,b_2]\;\supseteq [a_3,\,b_3]\;\supseteq\ldots$$
is a sequence of nested closed intervals, then is a sequence of nested closed intervals, then
\begin{align*} \begin{align*}
\bigcap_{n=1}^\infty [a_n,\,b_n] \neq \varnothing. \bigcap_{n=1}^\infty [a_n,\,b_n] \neq \varnothing.
\end{align*} \end{align*}
If also\, $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to\infty}(b_n-a_n) = 0$,\, then the infinite If also\, $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to\infty}(b_n-a_n) = 0$,\, then the infinite
intersection consists of a unique real number. intersection consists of a unique real number.
This result is called the \emph{nested interval theorem}. This result is called the \emph{nested interval theorem}.
It is a restatement of the \emph{finite intersection property} It is a restatement of the \emph{finite intersection property}
for the compact set $[a_1, b_1]$. for the compact set $[a_1, b_1]$.
The result may also be proven by elementary methods: The result may also be proven by elementary methods:
namely, any number lying in between the supremum of all the $a_n$ namely, any number lying in between the supremum of all the $a_n$
and the infimum of all the $b_n$ and the infimum of all the $b_n$
will be in all the nested intervals. will be in the infinite intersection.