PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Revision difference : proof of conformal mapping theorem
Version current Version 3
Let $D\subset\mathbb{C}$ be a domain, and let $f\colon D\to\mathbb{C}$ be an Let $D\subset\mathbb{C}$ be a domain, and let $f:D\to\mathbb{C}$ be an
analytic function. By identifying the complex plane $\mathbb{C}$ with analytic function. By identifying the complex plane $\mathbb{C}$ with
$\mathbb{R}^2$, we can view $f$ as a function from $\mathbb{R}^2$ to $\mathbb{R}^2$, we can view $f$ as a function from $\mathbb{R}^2$ to
itself: itself:
$$
\tilde f(x,y):=(\Re f(x+iy), \Im f(x+iy))=(u(x,y),v(x,y)) \tilde f(x,y):=(\Re f(x+iy), \Im f(x+iy))=(u(x,y),v(x,y))
$$
with $u$ and $v$ real functions. The Jacobian matrix of $\tilde f$ is with $u$ and $v$ real functions. The Jacobian matrix of $\tilde f$ is
$$
J(x,y)=\frac{\partial(u,v)}{\partial(x,y)}=\begin{pmatrix} J(x,y)=\frac{\partial(u,v)}{\partial(x,y)}=\begin{pmatrix}
u_x & u_y \\ u_x & u_y \\
v_x & v_y v_x & v_y
\end{pmatrix}. \end{pmatrix}.
$$
As an analytic function, $f$ satisfies the Cauchy-Riemann equations, As an analytic function, $f$ satisfies the Cauchy-Riemann equations,
so that $u_x=v_y$ and $u_y=-v_x$. At a fixed point $z=x+iy\in D$, we so that $u_x=v_y$ and $u_y=-v_x$. At a fixed point $z=x+iy\in D$, we
can therefore define $a=u_x(x,y)=v_y(x,y)$ and $b=u_y(x,y)=-v_x(x,y)$. can therefore define $a=u_x(x,y)=v_y(x,y)$ and $b=u_y(x,y)=-v_x(x,y)$.
We write $(a,b)$ in polar coordinates as $(r\cos\theta,r\sin\theta)$ We write $(a,b)$ in polar coordinates as $(r\cos\theta,r\sin\theta)$
and get and get
$$
J(x,y)=\begin{pmatrix} J(x,y)=\begin{pmatrix}
a & b \\ a & b \\
-b & a -b & a
\end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix} \end{pmatrix} = r\begin{pmatrix}
\cos\theta & \sin\theta \\ \cos\theta & \sin\theta \\
-\sin\theta & \cos\theta -\sin\theta & \cos\theta
\end{pmatrix}. \end{pmatrix}
$$
Now we consider two smooth curves through $(x,y)$, which we Now we consider two smooth curves through $(x,y)$, which we
parametrize by $\gamma_1(t)=(u_1(t),v_1(t))$ and parametrize by $\gamma_1(t)=(u_1(t),v_1(t))$ and
$\gamma_2(t)=(u_2(t),v_2(t))$. We can choose the parametrization such $\gamma_2(t)=(u_2(t),v_2(t))$. We can choose the parametrization such
that $\gamma_1(0)=\gamma_2(0)=z$. The images of these curves under that $\gamma_1(0)=\gamma_2(0)=z$. The images of these curves under
$\tilde f$ are $\tilde f\circ\gamma_1$ and $\tilde f\circ\gamma_2$, $\tilde f$ are $\tilde f\circ\gamma_1$ and $\tilde f\circ\gamma_2$,
respectively, and their derivatives at $t=0$ are respectively, and their derivatives at $t=0$ are
$$
(\tilde f\circ\gamma_1)'(0)= (\tilde f\circ\gamma_1)'(0)=
\frac{\partial(u,v)}{\partial(x,y)}(\gamma_1(0)) \frac{\partial(u,v)}{\partial(x,y)}(\gamma_1(0))
\cdot \frac{{\rm d}\gamma_1}{{\rm d}t}(0)= \cdot \frac{{\rm d}\gamma_1}{{\rm d}t}(0)=
J(x,y)\begin{pmatrix} J(x,y)\begin{pmatrix}
\frac{{\rm d}u_1}{{\rm d}t} \\ \frac{{\rm d}u_1}{{\rm d}t} \\
\frac{{\rm d}v_1}{{\rm d}t} \frac{{\rm d}v_1}{{\rm d}t}
\end{pmatrix} \end{pmatrix}
$$
and, similarly, and, similarly,
$$
(\tilde f\circ\gamma_2)'(0)=J(x,y)\begin{pmatrix} (\tilde f\circ\gamma_2)'(0)=J(x,y)\begin{pmatrix}
\frac{{\rm d}u_2}{{\rm d}t} \\ \frac{{\rm d}u_2}{{\rm d}t} \\
\frac{{\rm d}v_2}{{\rm d}t} \frac{{\rm d}v_2}{{\rm d}t}
\end{pmatrix} \end{pmatrix}
$$
by the chain rule. We see that if $f'(z)\neq 0$, $f$ transforms the by the chain rule. We see that if $f'(z)\neq 0$, $f$ transforms the
tangent vectors to $\gamma_1$ and $\gamma_2$ at $t=0$ (and therefore tangent vectors to $\gamma_1$ and $\gamma_2$ at $t=0$ (and therefore
in $z$) by the orthogonal matrix in $z$) by the orthogonal matrix
$$
J/r=\begin{pmatrix} J/r=\begin{pmatrix}
\cos\theta & \sin\theta \\ \cos\theta & \sin\theta \\
-\sin\theta & \cos\theta -\sin\theta & \cos\theta
\end{pmatrix} \end{pmatrix}
$$
and scales them by a factor of $r$. In particular, the transformation and scales them by a factor of $r$. In particular, the transformation
by an orthogonal matrix implies that the angle between the tangent by an orthogonal matrix implies that the angle between the tangent
vectors is preserved. Since the determinant of $J/r$ is 1, the vectors is preserved. Since the determinant of $J/r$ is 1, the
transformation also preserves orientation (the direction of the angle transformation also preserves orientation (the direction of the angle
between the tangent vectors). We conclude that $f$ is a conformal between the tangent vectors). We conclude that $f$ is a conformal
mapping at each point where its derivative is nonzero. mapping.