PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Revision difference : bilinear form
Version 44 Version 43
\paragraph{Definition.} \paragraph{Definition.}
Let $U,V,W$ be vector spaces over a field $K$. A \emph{bilinear map} Let $U,V,W$ be vector spaces over a field $K$. A \emph{bilinear map}
is a function $B: U is a function $B: U
\times V \to W$ such that \times V \to W$ such that
\begin{enumerate} \begin{enumerate}
\item the map $x \mapsto B(x,y)$ from $U$ to $W$ is linear for each $y \item the map $x \mapsto B(x,y)$ from $U$ to $W$ is linear for each $y
\in V$ \in V$
\item the map $y \mapsto B(x,y)$ from $V$ to $W$ is linear for each $x \item the map $y \mapsto B(x,y)$ from $V$ to $W$ is linear for each $x
\in U$. \in U$.
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}
That is, $B$ is \emph{bilinear} if it is linear in each parameter, That is, $B$ is \emph{bilinear} if it is linear in each parameter,
taken separately. taken separately.
\paragraph{Bilinear forms.} \paragraph{Bilinear forms.}
A \emph{bilinear form} is a bilinear map $B:V\times V\to K$. A A \emph{bilinear form} is a bilinear map $B:V\times V\to K$. A
$W$-valued bilinear form is a bilinear map $B: V\times V\to W$. One $W$-valued bilinear form is a bilinear map $B: V\times V\to W$. One
often encounters bilinear forms with additional assumptions. A often encounters bilinear forms with additional assumptions. A
bilinear form is called bilinear form is called
\begin{itemize} \begin{itemize}
\item \emph{symmetric} if $B(x,y) = B(y,x)$, $x,y \in V$; \item \emph{symmetric} if $B(x,y) = B(y,x)$, $x,y \in V$;
\item \emph{skew-symmetric} if $B(x,y) = -B(y,x)$, $x,y \in V$; \item \emph{skew-symmetric} if $B(x,y) = -B(y,x)$, $x,y \in V$;
\item \emph{alternating} if $B(x,x) = 0$, $x \in V$. \item \emph{alternating} if $B(x,x) = 0$, $x \in V$.
\end{itemize} \end{itemize}
By expanding $B(x+y,x+y) = 0$, we can show alternating implies By expanding $B(x+y,x+y) = 0$, we can show alternating implies
skew-symmetric. Further if $K$ is not of characteristic $2$, then skew-symmetric. Further if $K$ is not of characteristic $2$, then
skew-symmetric implies alternating. skew-symmetric implies alternating.
\paragraph{Left and Right Maps.} \paragraph{Left and Right Maps.}
Let $B:U\times V\to W$ be a bilinear map. We may identify $B$ with the Let $B:U\times V\to W$ be a bilinear map. We may identify $B$ with the
linear map $B_\otimes: U\otimes V\to W$ (see tensor product). We may linear map $B_\otimes: U\otimes V\to W$ (see tensor product). We may
also identify $B$ with the linear maps also identify $B$ with the linear maps
\begin{align*} \begin{align*}
& B_L:U\to L(V,W),\qquad B_L(x)(y) = B(x,y),\; x\in U,\; y\in V;\\ & B_L:U\to L(V,W),\qquad B_L(x)(y) = B(x,y),\; x\in U,\; y\in V;\\
& B_R:V\to L(U,W),\qquad B_R(y)(x) = B(x,y),\; x\in U,\; y\in V. & B_R:V\to L(U,W),\qquad B_R(y)(x) = B(x,y),\; x\in U,\; y\in V.
\end{align*} \end{align*}
called the left and right map, respectively. called the left and right map, respectively.
Next, suppose that $B:V\times V\to K$ is a bilinear form. Then both Next, suppose that $B:V\times V\to K$ is a bilinear form. Then both
$B_L$ and $B_R$ are linear maps from $V$ to $V^*$, the dual vector $B_L$ and $B_R$ are linear maps from $V$ to $V^*$, the dual vector
space of $V$. We can therefore say that $B$ is symmetric if and only space of $V$. We can therefore say that $B$ is symmetric if and only
if $B_L = B_R$ and that $B$ is anti-symmetric if and only if if $B_L = B_R$ and that $B$ is anti-symmetric if and only if
$B_L=-B_R$. If $V$ is finite-dimensional, we can identify $V$ and $B_L=-B_R$. If $V$ is finite-dimensional, we can identify $V$ and
$V^{**}$, and assert that $B_L=(B_R)^*$; the left and right maps are, in $V^{**}$, and assert that $B_L=(B_R)^*$; the left and right maps are, in
fact, dual homomorphisms. fact, dual homomorphisms.
\paragraph{Rank.} \paragraph{Rank.}
Let $B:U\times V\to W$ be a bilinear map, and suppose that $U,V$ are Let $B:U\times V\to W$ be a bilinear map, and suppose that $U,V$ are
finite dimensional. One can show that $\rank B_L = \rank B_R$. We call finite dimensional. One can show that $\rank B_L = \rank B_R$. We call
this integer $\rank B$, the \emph{\PMlinkescapetext{rank}} of $B$. this integer $\rank B$, the \emph{\PMlinkescapetext{rank}} of $B$.
Applying the rank-nullity theorem to both the left and right maps Applying the rank-nullity theorem to both the left and right maps
gives the following results: gives the following results:
\begin{align*} \begin{align*}
\dim U &= \dim \ker {B_L} + \rank B\\ \dim U &= \dim \ker {B_L} + \rank B\\
\dim V &= \dim \ker {B_R} + \rank B \dim V &= \dim \ker {B_R} + \rank B
\end{align*} \end{align*}
We say that $B$ is We say that $B$ is
\emph{non-degenerate} if both the left and right map are \emph{non-degenerate} if both the left and right map are
non-degenerate. Note that in order for $B$ to be non-degenerate it is non-degenerate. Note that in order for $B$ to be non-degenerate it is
necessary that $\dim U = \dim V$. If this holds, then $B$ is necessary that $\dim U = \dim V$. If this holds, then $B$ is
non-degenerate if and only if $\rank B$ is equal to $\dim U, \dim V$. non-degenerate if and only if $\rank B$ is equal to $\dim U, \dim V$.
\paragraph{Orthogonal complements.} \paragraph{Orthogonal complements.}
Let $B:V\times V\to K$ be a bilinear form, and let $S \subset V$ be a Let $B:V\times V\to K$ be a bilinear form, and let $S \subset V$ be a
subspace. The left and right orthogonal complements of $S$ are subspace. The left and right orthogonal complements of $S$ are
subspaces ${^\perp}S, S^\perp \subset V$ defined as follows: subspaces ${^\perp}S, S^\perp \subset V$ defined as follows:
\begin{align*} \begin{align*}
&{}^\perp S = \{ u\in V \mid B(u,v) = 0 \; \text{for all } v \in S \},\\ &{}^\perp S = \{ u\in V \mid B(u,v) = 0 \; \text{for all } v \in S \},\\
&S^\perp = \{ v\in V \mid B(u,v) = 0 \; \text{for all } u \in S \} . &S^\perp = \{ v\in V \mid B(u,v) = 0 \; \text{for all } u \in S \} .
\end{align*} \end{align*}
We may also realize $S^\perp$ by considering the linear map $B_{R}': We may also realize $S^\perp$ by considering the linear map $B_{R}':
V\to S^*$ obtained as the composition of $B_R: V\to S^*$ obtained as the composition of $B_R:
V\to V^*$ and the dual homomorphism $V^*\to S^*$. V\to V^*$ and the dual homomorphism $V^*\to S^*$.
Indeed, $S^\perp = \ker B^\prime_R$. An analogous Indeed, $S^\perp = \ker B^\prime_R$. An analogous
statement can be made for ${}^\perp S$. statement can be made for ${}^\perp S$.
Next, suppose that $B$ is non-degenerate. Next, suppose that $B$ is non-degenerate.
By the rank-nullity By the rank-nullity
theorem we have that theorem we have that
\begin{align*} \begin{align*}
\dim V &= \dim S + \dim S^\perp\\ \dim V &= \dim S + \dim S^\perp\\
&= \dim S + \dim {}^\perp S. &= \dim S + \dim {}^\perp S.
\end{align*} \end{align*}
Therefore, if $B$ is non-degenerate, then Therefore, if $B$ is non-degenerate, then
\[\dim S^\perp = \dim {}^\perp S. \] \[\dim S^\perp = \dim {}^\perp S. \]
Indeed, more can be said if $B$ is either symmetric or Indeed, more can be said if $B$ is either symmetric or
skew-symmetric. In this case, we actually have skew-symmetric. In this case, we actually have
\[{}^\perp S = S^\perp.\] \[{}^\perp S = S^\perp.\]
We say that $S\subset V$ is a non-degenerate subspace relative to $B$ We say that $S\subset V$ is a non-degenerate subspace relative to $B$
if the restriction of $B$ to $S\times S$ is non-degenerate. Thus, $S$ if the restriction of $B$ to $S\times S$ is non-degenerate. Thus, $S$
is a non-degenerate subspace if and only if $S \cap S^\perp = \{0\}$, is a non-degenerate subspace if and only if $S \cap S^\perp = \{0\}$,
and also $S\cap {}^\perp S = \{ 0\}$. Hence, if $B$ is non-degenerate and also $S\cap {}^\perp S = \{ 0\}$. Hence, if $B$ is non-degenerate
and if $S$ is a non-degenerate and if $S$ is a non-degenerate
subspace, we have subspace, we have
\[ V = S \oplus S^\perp = S\oplus {}^\perp S.\] Finally, note that if \[ V = S \oplus S^\perp = S\oplus {}^\perp S.\] Finally, note that if
$B$ is positive-definite, then $B$ is necessarily non-degenerate and $B$ is positive-definite, then $B$ is necessarily non-degenerate and
that every subspace is non-degenerate. In this way we arrive at the that every subspace is non-degenerate. In this way we arrive at the
following well-known result: if $V$ is positive-definite inner product following well-known result: if $V$ is positive-definite inner product
space, then space, then
\[V = S \oplus S^\perp \] for every subspace $S\subset V$. \[V = S \oplus S^\perp \] for every subspace $S\subset V$.
\paragraph{Adjoints.} \paragraph{Adjoints.}
Let $B: V \times V \rightarrow K$ be a non-degenerate bilinear Let $B: V \times V \rightarrow K$ be a non-degenerate bilinear
form, and let $T \in L(V,V)$ be a linear endomorphism. We define the form, and let $T \in L(V,V)$ be a linear endomorphism. We define the
right adjoint $T^\star \in right adjoint $T^\star \in
L(V,V)$ to be the unique linear map such that L(V,V)$ to be the unique linear map such that
\[ B(Tu, v) = B(u, T^\star v) ,\quad u,v \in V.\] \[ B(Tu, v) = B(u, T^\star v) ,\quad u,v \in V.\]
Letting $T^\ast : V^\ast \to V^\ast$ denote the dual homomorphism, Letting $T^\ast : V^\ast \to V^\ast$ denote the dual homomorphism,
we also have we also have
\[ T^\star = {B_R}^{-1} \circ T^\ast \circ B_R.\] \[ T^\star = {B_R}^{-1} \circ T^\ast \circ B_R.\]
Similarly, we define the left adjoint ${}^\star T\in L(V,V)$ by Similarly, we define the left adjoint ${}^\star T\in L(V,V)$ by
\[ {}^\star T = {B_L}^{-1} \circ T^\ast \circ B_L.\] We then have \[ {}^\star T = {B_L}^{-1} \circ T^\ast \circ B_L.\] We then have
\[ B(u, Tv) = B({}^\star T u, v) ,\quad u,v \in V.\] \[ B(u, Tv) = B({}^\star T u, v) ,\quad u,v \in V.\]
If $B$ is either symmetric or skew-symmetric, then ${}^\star T = If $B$ is either symmetric or skew-symmetric, then ${}^\star T =
T^\star$, and we simply use $T^\star$ to refer to the adjoint homomorphism. T^\star$, and we simply use $T^\star$ to refer to the adjoint homomorphism.
\paragraph{Additional remarks.} \paragraph{Additional remarks.}
\begin{enumerate} \begin{enumerate}
\item \item
if $B$ is a symmetric, non-degenerate bilinear form, if $B$ is a symmetric, non-degenerate bilinear form,
then the adjoint operation is represented, relative to an orthogonal then the adjoint operation is represented, relative to an orthogonal
basis (if one exists), by the matrix transpose. basis (if one exists), by the matrix transpose.
\item If $B$ is a symmetric, non-degenerate bilinear form \item If $B$ is a symmetric, non-degenerate bilinear form
then $T\in L(V,V)$ is then said to be a \emph{normal operator} (with then $T\in L(V,V)$ is then said to be a \emph{normal operator} (with
respect to $B$) if $T$ commutes with its adjoint $T^\star$. respect to $B$) if $T$ commutes with its adjoint $T^\star$.
\item An $n \times m$ matrix may be regarded as a bilinear form over \item An $n \times m$ matrix may be regarded as a bilinear form over
$K^n\times K^m$. Two such matrices, $B$ and $C$, are said to be $K^n\times K^m$. Two such matrices, $B$ and $C$, are said to be
congruent if there exists an invertible $P$ such that $B = P^{T}CP$. congruent if there exists an invertible $P$ such that $B = P^{T}CP$.
\item The identity matrix, $I_n$ on $\Rset^n\times \Rset^n$ gives the standard \item The identity matrix, $I_n$ on $\Rset^n\times \Rset^n$ gives the standard
Euclidean inner product on $\Rset^n$. Euclidean inner product on $\Rset^n$.
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}