PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Revision difference : Kuroda normal form
Version 6 Version 5
Just like every context-free grammar can be ``normalized'' or ``standardized'' in one of the so-called \PMlinkname{normal forms}{ChomskyNormalForm}, so can a context-sensitive grammar be normalized. The particular normalization discussed in this entry is what is known as the Kuroda normal form. Just like every context-free grammar can be ``normalized'' or ``standardized'' in one of the so-called \PMlinkname{normal forms}{ChomskyNormalForm}, so can a context-sensitive grammar be normalized. The particular normalization discussed in this entry is what is known as the Kuroda normal form.
A formal grammar $G=(\Sigma,N,P,\sigma)$ is in \emph{Kuroda normal form} if its productions have one of the following forms: A formal grammar $G=(\Sigma,N,P,\sigma)$ is in \emph{Kuroda normal form} if its productions have one of the following forms:
\begin{enumerate} \begin{enumerate}
\item $A\to a$, \item $A\to a$,
\item $A\to BC$, \item $A\to BC$,
\item $AB\to CD$. \item $AB\to CD$.
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}
where $a\in \Sigma-N$ and $A,B,C,D\in N$. where $a\in \Sigma-N$ and $A,B,C,D\in N$.
Note: Sometimes the form $A\to B$, where $B\in N$ is added to the list above. However, we may remove a production of this form by replacing all occurrences of $B$ by $A$ in every production of $G$. Note: Sometimes the form $A\to B$, where $B\in N$ is added to the list above. However, we may replace a production of this form by replacing all occurrences of $B$ by $A$ in every production of $G$. The usefulness of the Kuroda normal forms is captured in the following result:
The usefulness of the Kuroda normal forms is captured in the following result:
\begin{thm} A grammar is length-increasing iff it is equivalent to a grammar in Kuroda normal form. \end{thm} \begin{thm} A grammar is length-increasing iff it is equivalent to a grammar in Kuroda normal form. \end{thm}
Note that the third production form $AB\to CD$ may be replaced by the following productions Note that the third production form $AB\to CD$ may be replaced by the following productions
\begin{multicols}{2}{ \begin{multicols}{2}{
\begin{enumerate} \begin{enumerate}
\item $AB\to AX$ \\ [-3ex] \item $AB\to AX$ \\ [-3ex]
\item $AX\to YX$ \\ [-3ex] \item $AX\to YX$ \\ [-3ex]
\item $YX\to YD$ \\ [-3ex] \item $YX\to YD$ \\ [-3ex]
\item $YD\to CD$ \\ [-3ex] \item $YD\to CD$ \\ [-3ex]
\end{enumerate}} \end{enumerate}}
\end{multicols} \end{multicols}
where $X,Y$ are new non-terminals introduced to $G$. Note also that, among the new forms, 1 and 3 are right context-sensitive, while 2 and 4 are left context-sensitive. Thus, a grammar in Kuroda normal form is equivalent to a grammar with productions having one of the following forms: where $X,Y$ are new non-terminals introduced to $G$. Note also that, among the new forms, 1 and 3 are right context-sensitive, while 2 and 4 are left context-sensitive. Thus, a grammar in Kuroda normal form is equivalent to a grammar with productions having one of the following forms:
\begin{enumerate} \begin{enumerate}
\item $A\to a$, \item $A\to a$,
\item $A\to BC$, \item $A\to BC$,
\item $AB\to AC$, \item $AB\to AC$,
\item $AB\to CB$. \item $AB\to CB$.
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}
It can be shown that It can be shown that
\begin{thm} A grammar in Kuroda normal form if it is equivalent to a grammar whose productions are in one of forms $1,2$, or $3$. \end{thm} \begin{thm} A grammar in Kuroda normal form if it is equivalent to a grammar whose productions are in one of forms $1,2$, or $3$. \end{thm}
By symmetry, a grammar in Kuroda normal form is equivalent to a grammar whose productions are in one of forms $1,2$, or $4$. A grammar whose productions are in one of forms $1,2$, or $3$ is said to be in \emph{one-sided normal form}. By symmetry, a grammar in Kuroda normal form is equivalent to a grammar whose productions are in one of forms $1,2$, or $3$. A grammar whose productions are in one of forms $1,2$, or $3$ is said to be in \emph{one-sided normal form}.
As a corollary, every $\lambda$-free context-sensitive language (not containing the empty word $\lambda$) can be generated by a grammar in one-sided normal form. As a corollary, every $\lambda$-free context-sensitive language (not containing the empty word $\lambda$) can be generated by a grammar in one-sided normal form.
What if we throw in production of the form $A\to \lambda$ in the above list? Then certainly every context-sensitive language has a grammar in this ``extended'' normal form. In fact, we have What if we throw in production of the form $A\to \lambda$ in the above list? Then certainly every context-sensitive language has a grammar in this ``extended'' normal form. In fact, we have
\begin{thm} Every type-0 language can be generated by a grammar whose productions are in one of the following forms: \begin{thm} Every type-0 language can be generated by a grammar whose productions are in one of the following forms:
\begin{enumerate} \begin{enumerate}
\item $A\to a$, \item $A\to a$,
\item $A\to BC$, \item $A\to BC$,
\item $AB\to AC$, \item $AB\to AC$,
\item $A\to \lambda$. \item $A\to \lambda$.
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}
\end{thm} \end{thm}
\begin{thebibliography}{9} \begin{thebibliography}{9}
\bibitem{AS} G. E. R\'{e}v\'{e}sz, {\em Introduction to Formal Languages}, Dover Publications (1991). \bibitem{AS} G. E. R\'{e}v\'{e}sz, {\em Introduction to Formal Languages}, Dover Publications (1991).
\bibitem{ms} A. Mateescu, A. Salomaa, {\em Chapter 4 - Aspects of Classical Language Theory, Handbook of Formal Languages: Volume 1. Word, Language, Grammar}, Springer, (1997). \bibitem{ms} A. Mateescu, A. Salomaa, {\em Chapter 4 - Aspects of Classical Language Theory, Handbook of Formal Languages: Volume 1. Word, Language, Grammar}, Springer, (1997).
\end{thebibliography} \end{thebibliography}