PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Revision difference : chaotic dynamical system
Version 6 Version 5
As Strogatz says in reference [1], ``No definition of the term chaos is universally accepted yet, but almost everyone would agree on the three ingredients used in the following working definition''. As Strogatz says in reference [1], "No definition of the term chaos is universally accepted yet, but almost everyone would agree on the three ingredients used in the following working definition".
Chaos is aperiodic long-term behavior in a deterministic system that exhibits sensitive dependence on initial conditions. Chaos is aperiodic long-term behavior in a deterministic system that exhibits sensitive dependence on initial conditions.
Aperiodic long-term behavior means that there are trajectories which do not settle down to fixed points, periodic orbits, or quasiperiodic orbits as $t \to \infty$. For the purposes of this definition, a trajectory which approaches a limit of $\infty$ as $t \to \infty$ should be considered to have a fixpoint at $\infty$. Aperiodic long-term behavior means that there are trajectories which do not settle down to fixed points, periodic orbits, or quasiperiodic orbits as $t \to \infty$. For the purposes of this definition, a trajectory which approaches a limit of $\infty$ as $t \to \infty$ should be considered to have a fixpoint at $\infty$.
Sensitive dependence on initial conditions means that nearby trajectories separate exponentially fast, i.e., the system has a positive Liapunov exponent. Sensitive dependence on initial conditions means that nearby trajectories separate exponentially fast, i.e., the system has a positive Liapunov exponent.
Strogatz notes that he favors additional contraints on the aperidodic long-term behavior, but leaves open what form they may take. He suggests two alternatives to fulfill this: Strogatz notes that he favors additional contraints on the aperidodic long-term behavior, but leaves open what form they may take. He suggests two alternatives to fulfill this:
\begin{enumerate} \begin{enumerate}
\item Requiring that $\exists$ an open set of initial conditions having aperiodic trajectories, or \item Requiring that $\exists$ an open set of initial conditions having aperiodic trajectories, or
\item If one picks a random initial condition $x(0)$ then there must be a nonzero chance of the associated trajectory $x(t)$ being aperiodic. \item If one picks a random initial condition $x(0)$ then there must be a nonzero chance of the associated trajectory $x(t)$ being aperiodic.
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}
\subsection{Further reading} \subsection{Further reading}
\begin{enumerate} \begin{enumerate}
\item B. Codenotti and Luciano Margara. Chaos in Mathematics, Physics, and Computer Science: Similarities and Dissimilarities. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/Einmag\_Abstr/BCodenotti.html \item B. Codenotti and Luciano Margara. Chaos in Mathematics, Physics, and Computer Science: Similarities and Dissimilarities. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/Einmag\_Abstr/BCodenotti.html
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}
\subsection{References} \subsection{References}
\begin{enumerate} \begin{enumerate}
\item Steven H. Strogatz, "Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos". Westview Press, 1994. \item Steven H. Strogatz, "Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos". Westview Press, 1994.
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}