PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Revision difference : axiom schema of separation
Version 6 Version 5
Let $\phi(u, p)$ be a formula. For any $X$ and $p$, there exists a set $Y = \{ u \in X : \phi(u, p) \}$. Let $\phi(u, p)$ be a formula. For any $X$ and $p$, there exists a set $Y = \{ u \in X : \phi(u, p) \}$.
The Axiom Schema of Separation is an axiom schema of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. Note that it represents infinitely many individual axioms, one for each formula $\phi$. In symbols, it reads: The Axiom Schema of Separation is an axiom schema of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. Note that it represents infinitely many individual axioms, one for each formula $\phi$. In symbols, it reads:
\forall X \forall p \exists Y \forall u(u \in Y \leftrightarrow u \in X \land \phi(u, p)). \forall X \forall p \exists Y \forall u(u \in Y \leftrightarrow u \in X \land \phi(u, p)).
By Extensionality, the set $Y$ is unique. By Extensionality, the set $Y$ is unique.
The Axiom Schema of Separation implies that $\phi$ may depend on more than one parameter $p$. We may show, by induction on $n$, The Axiom Schema of Separation implies that $\phi$ may depend on more than one parameter $p$. We may show, by induction on $n$, that if $\phi(u, p_1, \ldots, p_n)$ is a formula, then
\forall X \forall p_1 \cdots \forall p_n \exists Y \forall u(u \in Y \leftrightarrow u \in X \land \phi(u, p_1, \ldots, p_n))
holds, using the Axiom Schema of Separation and the Axiom of Pairing.