PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Revision difference : Ricci tensor
Version current Version 5
\paragraph{Definition.} \paragraph{Definition.}
The \emph{Ricci curvature tensor} is a rank $2$, symmetric tensor that The \emph{Ricci curvature tensor} is a rank $2$, symmetric tensor that
arises naturally in pseudo-Riemannian geometry. Let $(M,g_{ij})$ be a arises naturally in pseudo-Riemannian geometry. Let $(M,g_{ij})$ be a
smooth, $n$-dimensional pseudo-Riemannian manifold, and let smooth, $n$-dimensional pseudo-Riemannian manifold, and let
$R^i{}_{jkl}$ denote the corresponding Riemann curvature tensor. The $R^i{}_{jkl}$ denote the corresponding Riemann curvature tensor. The
Ricci tensor $R_{ij}$ is commonly defined as the following contraction Ricci tensor $R_{ij}$ is commonly defined as the following contraction
of the full curvature tensor: of the full curvature tensor:
\[R_{ij} = R^k{}_{ikj}. \[R_{ij} = R^k{}_{ikj}.
\] \]
The index symmetry of $R_{ij}$, so defined, follows from the symmetry The index symmetry of $R_{ij}$, so defined, follows from the symmetry
properties of the Riemann curvature. To wit, properties of the Riemann curvature. To wit,
\[ R_{ij} = R^k{}_{ikj} = R_{ki}{}^k{}_j = R^k{}_{jki} = R_{ji}.\] \[ R_{ij} = R^k{}_{ikj} = R_{ki}{}^k{}_j = R^k{}_{jki} = R_{ji}.\]
It is also convenient to regard the Ricci tensor as a symmetric bilinear It is also convenient to regard the Ricci tensor as a symmetric bilinear
form. To that end for vector-fields $X,Y$ we will write form. To that end for vector-fields $X,Y$ we will write
\[ \Ric(X,Y) = X^i Y^j R_{ij}.\] \[ \Ric(X,Y) = X^i Y^j R_{ij}.\]
\paragraph{Related objects.} \paragraph{Related objects.}
Contracting the Ricci tensor, we obtain an important scalar invariant Contracting the Ricci tensor, we obtain an important scalar invariant
\[R=R^i{}_i,\] called the scalar curvature, and sometimes also called \[R=R^i{}_i,\] called the scalar curvature, and sometimes also called
the Ricci scalar. Closely related to the Ricci tensor is the tensor the Ricci scalar. Closely related to the Ricci tensor is the tensor
\[G_{ij} = R_{ij} - \frac{1}{2} R\, g_{ij},\] called the \emph{Einstein \[G_{ij} = R_{ij} - \frac{1}{2} R\, g_{ij},\] called the Einstein
tensor}. The Einstein tensor is also known as the trace-reversed Ricci tensor. The Einstein tensor is also known as the trace-reversed Ricci
tensor owing to the fact that tensor owing to the fact that
\[ G^i{}_i = - R. \] \[ G^i{}_i = - R. \]
Another related tensor is Another related tensor is
\[S_{ij} = R_{ij} - \frac{1}{n} R\, g_{ij}.\] \[S_{ij} = R_{ij} - \frac{1}{n} R\, g_{ij}.\]
This is called This is called
the the
trace-free Ricci tensor, owing to the fact that the above definition trace-free Ricci tensor, owing to the fact that the above definition
implies that implies that
\[ S^i{}_i=0.\] \[ S^i{}_i=0.\]
\paragraph{Geometric interpretation.} \paragraph{Geometric interpretation.}
In Riemannian geometry, the Ricci tensor represents the average value In Riemannian geometry, the Ricci tensor represents the average value
of the sectional curvature along a particular direction. of the sectional curvature along a particular direction.
Let Let
\[ K_x(u,v) = \frac{R_x(u,v,v,u)}{g_x(u,u) g_x(v,v) - g_x(u,v)^2} \[ K_x(u,v) = \frac{R_x(u,v,v,u)}{g_x(u,u) g_x(v,v) - g_x(u,v)^2}
\] \]
denote the sectional curvature of $M$ along the plane spanned by denote the sectional curvature of $M$ along the plane spanned by
vectors $u,v\in T_x M$. Fix a point $x\in M$ and a tangent vector vectors $u,v\in T_x M$. Fix a point $x\in M$ and a tangent vector
$v\in T_xM$, and let $v\in T_xM$, and let
\[ \[
S_x(v)=\{ u\in T_xM \colon g_x(u,u) = 1,\; g_x(u,v)=0 \} S_x(v)=\{ u\in T_xM \colon g_x(u,u) = 1,\; g_x(u,v)=0 \}
\] denote the $n-2$ dimensional \] denote the $n-2$ dimensional
sphere of those unit vectors at $x$ that are perpendicular to $v$. sphere of those unit vectors at $x$ that are perpendicular to $v$.
Let $\mu_x$ denote the natural Let $\mu_x$ denote the natural
$(n-2)$-dimensional volume measure on $T_xM$, normalized so that $(n-2)$-dimensional volume measure on $T_xM$, normalized so that
\[ \int_{S_x(v)} \mu_x = 1.\] \[ \int_{S_x(v)} \mu_x = 1.\]
In this way, the quantity In this way, the quantity
\[ \int_{S_x(v)}\!\! K_x(\cdot,v) \mu_x, \] \[ \int_{S_x(v)}\!\! K_x(\cdot,v) \mu_x, \]
describes the average value of the sectional curvature for all planes describes the average value of the sectional curvature for all planes
in $T_x M$ that contain $v$. It is possible to show that in $T_x M$ that contain $v$. It is possible to show that
\[ \Ric_x(v,v)= (1-n)\int_{S_x(v)}\!\! K_x(\cdot,v) \mu_x,\] \[ \Ric_x(v,v)= (1-n)\int_{S_x(v)}\!\! K_x(\cdot,v) \mu_x,\]
thereby giving us the desired geometric interpretation. thereby giving us the desired geometric interpretation.
\paragraph{Decomposition of the curvature tensor.} \paragraph{Decomposition of the curvature tensor.}
For $n\geq 3$, the Ricci tensor can be characterized in terms of the For $n\geq 3$, the Ricci tensor can be characterized in terms of the
decomposition of the full curvature tensor into three covariantly decomposition of the full curvature tensor into three covariantly
defined summands, namely defined summands, namely
\begin{align*} \begin{align*}
F_{ijkl} &= \tfrac{1}{n-2} \left( S_{jl}\, g_{ik}+S_{ik}\, F_{ijkl} &= \tfrac{1}{n-2} \left( S_{jl}\, g_{ik}+S_{ik}\,
g_{jl}-S_{il}\, g_{jk}-S_{jk}\, g_{il}\right),\\ g_{jl}-S_{il}\, g_{jk}-S_{jk}\, g_{il}\right),\\
E_{ijkl} &= \tfrac{1}{n(n-1)}R \left( g_{jl}\,g_{ik} - E_{ijkl} &= \tfrac{1}{n(n-1)}R \left( g_{jl}\,g_{ik} -
g_{il}\,g_{jk}\right),\\ g_{il}\,g_{jk}\right),\\
W_{ijkl} &= R_{ijkl}-F_{ijkl}-E_{ijkl}. W_{ijkl} &= R_{ijkl}-F_{ijkl}-E_{ijkl}.
\end{align*} \end{align*}
The $W_{ijkl}$ is called the \emph{Weyl curvature tensor}. It is The $W_{ijkl}$ is called the \emph{Weyl curvature tensor}. It is
the conformally invariant, trace-free part of the curvature tensor. the conformally invariant, trace-free part of the curvature tensor.
Indeed, with the above definitions, we have Indeed, with the above definitions, we have
\[ W^k{}_{ikj}=0.\] The $E_{ijkl}$ and $F_{ijkl}$ correspond to the \[ W^k{}_{ikj}=0.\] The $E_{ijkl}$ and $F_{ijkl}$ correspond to the
trace-free part of the Ricci curvature tensor, and to the Ricci trace-free part of the Ricci curvature tensor, and to the Ricci
scalar. Indeed, we can recover $S_{ij}$ and $R$ from $E_{ijkl}$ and scalar. Indeed, we can recover $S_{ij}$ and $R$ from $E_{ijkl}$ and
$F_{ijkl}$ as follows: $F_{ijkl}$ as follows:
\begin{align*} \begin{align*}
S_{ij} &= F^k{}_{ikj},\\ S_{ij} &= F^k{}_{ikj},\\
E^{ij}{}_{ij} &= R. E^{ij}{}_{ij} &= R.
\end{align*} \end{align*}
\paragraph{Relativity.} The Ricci tensor also plays an important role \paragraph{Relativity.} The Ricci tensor also plays an important role
in the theory of general relativity. In this keystone application, in the theory of general relativity. In this keystone application,
$M$ is a 4-dimensional pseudo-Riemannian manifold with signature $M$ is a 4-dimensional pseudo-Riemannian manifold with signature
$(3,1)$. The Einstein field equations assert that the energy-momentum $(3,1)$. The Einstein field equations assert that the energy-momentum
tensor is proportional to the Einstein tensor. In particular, the tensor is proportional to the Einstein tensor. In particular, the
equation equation
\[ R_{ij}=0 \] \[ R_{ij}=0 \]
is the field equation for a vacuum space-time. In geometry, a is the field equation for a vacuum space-time. In geometry, a
pseudo-Riemannian manifold that satisfies this equation is called pseudo-Riemannian manifold that satisfies this equation is called
Ricci-flat. It is possible to prove that a manifold is Ricci flat if Ricci-flat. It is possible to prove that a manifold is Ricci flat if
and only if locally, the manifold, is conformally equivalent to flat space. and only if locally, the manifold, is conformally equivalent to flat space.