PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Revision difference : numerable set
Version 7 Version 6
Let $X$ be a set. An \emph{enumeration} on $X$ is a surjection from the set of natural numbers $\mathbb{N}$ to $X$. Let $X$ be a set. An \emph{enumeration} on $X$ is a surjection from the set of natural numbers $\mathbb{N}$ to $X$.
A set $X$ is called \emph{numerable} if there is a bijective enumeration on $X$. A set $X$ is called \emph{numerable} if there is a bijective enumeration on $X$.
It is easy to show that $\mathbb{Z}$ and $\mathbb{Q}$ are numerable. It is easy to show that $\mathbb{Z}$ and $\mathbb{Q}$ are numerable.
It is a standard fact that $\mathbb{R}$ is not numerable. For, if we suppose that the numbers [0,1] were countable, we can arrange them in a list (given by the supposed bijection). It is a standard fact that $\mathbb{R}$ is not numerable. For, if we suppose that the numbers [0,1] were countable, we can arrange them in a list (given by the supposed bijection).
Representing them in a binary form, it is not hard to construct an element in [0,1], which is not in the list. Representing them in a binary form, anyone would be able to construct an object in [0,1], which is not in the list.
This contradiction implies that [0,1]$\subset\mathbb{R}$ is not numerable. This contradiction implies that [0,1]$\subset\mathbb{R}$ is not numerable.
\textbf{Remark}. If the enumeration $\mathbb{N}\to X$ is furthermore a computable function, then we say that $X$ is \emph{enumerable}. There exists numerable sets that are not enumerable. \textbf{Remark}. If the enumeration $\mathbb{N}\to X$ is furthermore a computable function, then we say that $X$ is \emph{enumerable}. There exists numerable sets that are not enumerable.