PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Revision difference : Lychrel number
Version current Version 6
\PMlinkescapeword{range} \PMlinkescapeword{ranges} \PMlinkescapeword{range} \PMlinkescapeword{ranges}
A \emph{Lychrel number} is a number which never yields a palindrome in the iterative process of adding to itself a copy of itself with digits reversed. For example, if we start with the number 983 we get: A \emph{Lychrel number} is a number which never yields a palindrome in the iterative process of adding to itself a copy of itself with digits reversed. For example, if we start with the number 983 we get:
\begin{itemize} \begin{itemize}
\item $983+389 = 1372$ \item $983+389 = 1372$
\item $1372+2731 = 4103$ \item $1372+2731 = 4103$
\item $4103+3014 = 7117$ \item $4103+3014 = 7117$
\end{itemize} \end{itemize}
So in 3 steps we get a palindrome, hence 983 is not a Lychrel number. So in 3 steps we get a palindrome, hence 983 is not a Lychrel number.
In fact, it is not known if there exist any Lychrel numbers in base 10 (numbers colloquially called ``Lychrel numbers'' in base 10 are in fact just \emph{Lychrel candidates}). However, in base 2 for example, there have been numbers proven to be Lychrel numbers\footnote{\cite{walker} informs us that Ronald Sprague has proved that the number 10110, for example, is a Lychrel number is base 2.}. The first Lychrel candidate is 196: In fact, it is not known if there exist any Lychrel numbers in base 10 (numbers colloquially called ``Lychrel numbers'' in base 10 are in fact just \emph{Lychrel candidates}). However, in base 2 for example, there have been numbers proven to be Lychrel numbers\footnote{\cite{walker} informs us that Ronald Sprague has proved that the number 10110, for example, is a Lychrel number is base 2.}). The first Lychrel candidate is 196:
\begin{itemize} \begin{itemize}
\item $196+691 = 887$ \item $196+691 = 887$
\item $887+788 = 1675$ \item $887+788 = 1675$
\item $1675+5761 = 7436$ \item $1675+5761 = 7436$
\item $7436+6347 = 13783$ \item $7436+6347 = 13783$
\item $13783+38731 = 52514$ \item $13783+38731 = 52514$
\item $52514+41525 = 94039$ \item $52514+41525 = 94039$
\item $94039+93049 = 187088$ \item $94039+93049 = 187088$
\item $187088+880781 = 1067869$ \item $187088+880781 = 1067869$
\item $\ldots$ \item $\ldots$
\end{itemize} \end{itemize}
This has been followed out to millions of digits, with no palindrome found in the sequence. This has been followed out to millions of digits, with no palindrome found in the sequence.
The following table gives the number of Lychrel candidates found within ascending ranges: The following table gives the number of Lychrel candidates found within ascending ranges:
\begin{center} \begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{cc} \begin{tabular}{cc}
Range & Possible Lychrels \\ Range & Possible Lychrels \\
\hline \hline
0 - 100 & 0 \\ 0 - 100 & 0 \\
100 - 1,000 & 2 \\ 100 - 1,000 & 2 \\
1,000 - 10,000 & 3 \\ 1,000 - 10,000 & 3 \\
10,000 - 100,000 & 69 \\ 10,000 - 100,000 & 69 \\
100,000 - 1,000,000 & 99 \\ 100,000 - 1,000,000 & 99 \\
10,000,000 - 100,000,000 & 1728 \\ 10,000,000 - 100,000,000 & 1728 \\
100,000,000 - 1,000,000,000 & 29,813 \\ 100,000,000 - 1,000,000,000 & 29,813 \\
\end{tabular} \end{tabular}
\end{center} \end{center}
\begin{thebibliography}{9} \begin{thebibliography}{9}
\bibitem{vl} Wade VanLandingham, \PMlinkexternal{196 And Other Lychrel Numbers}{http://www.p196.org/} \bibitem{vl} Wade VanLandingham, \PMlinkexternal{196 And Other Lychrel Numbers}{http://www.p196.org/}
\bibitem{walker} John Walker, \PMlinkexternal{Three Years of Computing}{http://www.fourmilab.ch/documents/threeyears/threeyears.html} \bibitem{walker} John Walker, \PMlinkexternal{Three Years of Computing}{http://www.fourmilab.ch/documents/threeyears/threeyears.html}
\end{thebibliography} \end{thebibliography}