PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Viewing Version 3 of 'essential supremum'
[ view 'essential supremum' | back to history ]

Title of object: essential supremum
Canonical Name: EssentialSupremum
Type: Definition

Created on: 2002-02-17 14:16:55
Modified on: 2009-02-01 14:33:05

Creator: gel
Modifier: gel
Author: gel
Author: drummond

Classification: msc:28C20
Synonyms: essential supremum=ess-sup
essential supremum=ess sup

Revision comment (for changes between this and next version):

update associations

Preamble:

\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}

% used for TeXing text within eps files
%\usepackage{psfrag}
% need this for including graphics (\includegraphics)
%\usepackage{graphicx}
% for neatly defining theorems and propositions
%\usepackage{amsthm}
% making logically defined graphics
%\usepackage{xypic}

% there are many more packages, add them here as you need them

% define commands here
\newcommand{\reals}{\mathbb{R}}
\newcommand{\set}[1]{\{#1\}}
\newcommand{\defined}{:=}
\newcommand{\esssup}{{\mathrm{ess}\sup}}
\newcommand{\essinf}{{\mathrm{ess}\inf}}
Content:

\PMlinkescapeword{even}
\PMlinkescapeword{state}
\PMlinkescapeword{almost everywhere}
\PMlinkescapeword{collection}
\PMlinkescapeword{measurable}
\PMlinkescapeword{measure}
\PMlinkescapeword{inequalities}
\PMlinkescapeword{conversely}

\section*{Essential supremum of a function}

Let $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, \mu)$ be a measure space and let $f$ be a Borel measurable function from $\Omega$ to the extended real numbers $\mathbb{\bar R}$. The \emph{essential supremum} of $f$ is the smallest number $a\in\mathbb{\bar R}$ for which $f$ only exceeds $a$ on a set of measure zero. This allows us to generalize the maximum of a function in a useful way.

More formally, we define $\mathrm{ess } \sup f$ as follows. Let $a \in \reals$, and define

\begin{equation*}
M_{a} = \set{x: f(x) > a},
\end{equation*}
the subset of $X$ where $f(x)$ is greater than $a$. Then let
\begin{equation*}
A_{0} = \set{a \in \reals: \mu(M_a) = 0},
\end{equation*}
the set of real numbers for which $M_a$ has measure zero. The essential supremum of $f$ is
\begin{equation*}
\mathrm{ess } \sup f \defined \inf A_0.
\end{equation*}
The supremum is taken in the set of extended real numbers so, $\mathrm{ess}\sup f=\infty$ if $A_0=\emptyset$ and $\mathrm{ess}\sup f = -\infty$ if $A_0=\mathbb{R}$.

\section*{Essential supremum of a collection of functions}

Let $(\Omega,\mathcal{F},\mu)$ be a measure space, and $\mathcal{S}$ be a collection of measurable functions $f\colon\Omega\rightarrow\mathbb{\bar R}$. The Borel $\sigma$-algebra on $\mathbb{\bar R}$ is used.

If $\mathcal{S}$ is countable then we can define the pointwise supremum of the functions in $\mathcal{S}$, which will itself be measurable. However, if $\mathcal{S}$ is uncountable then this is often not useful, and does not even have to be measurable. Instead, the \emph{essential supremum} can be used.

The essential supremum of $\mathcal{S}$, written as $\esssup\,\mathcal{S}$, if it exists, is a measurable function $f\colon\Omega\rightarrow\mathbb{\bar R}$ satisfying the following.
\begin{itemize}
\item $f\ge g$, $\mu$-\PMlinkname{almost everywhere}{AlmostSurely}, for any $g\in\mathcal{S}$.
\item if $g\colon\Omega\rightarrow\mathbb{\bar R}$ is measurable and $g\ge h$ ($\mu$-a.e.) for every $h\in\mathcal{S}$, then $f\ge g$ ($\mu$-a.e.).
\end{itemize}
Similarly, the \emph{essential infimum}, $\essinf\mathcal{S}$ is defined by replacing the inequalities `$\ge$' by `$\le$' in the above definition.

Note that if $f$ is the essential supremum and $g\colon\Omega\rightarrow\mathbb{\bar R}$ is equal to $f$ $\mu$-almost everywhere, then $g$ is also an essential supremum. Conversely, if $f,g$ are both essential supremums then, from the above definition, $f\le g$ and $g\le f$, so $f=g$ ($\mu$-a.e.). So, the essential supremum (and the essential infimum), if it exists, is only defined almost everywhere.

It can be shown that, for a $\sigma$-finite measure $\mu$, the \PMlinkname{essential supremum and essential infimum always exist}{ExistenceOfTheEssentialSupremum}. Furthermore, they are always equal to the supremum or infimum of some countable subset of $\mathcal{S}$.