PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Viewing Version 3 of 'first order theories'
[ view 'first order theories' | back to history ]

Title of object: first order theories
Canonical Name: FirstOrderTheories
Type: Definition

Created on: 2002-06-03 00:24:43
Modified on: 2002-06-03 18:51:14

Creator: ratboy
Modifier: ratboy
Author: jihemme

Classification: msc:03B10, msc:03C07
Defines: theory, complete theory, axiomatizable theory

Preamble:

% this is the default PlanetMath preamble. as your knowledge
% of TeX increases, you will probably want to edit this, but
% it should be fine as is for beginners.

% almost certainly you want these
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}

% used for TeXing text within eps files
%\usepackage{psfrag}
% need this for including graphics (\includegraphics)
%\usepackage{graphicx}
% for neatly defining theorems and propositions
%\usepackage{amsthm}
% making logically defined graphics
\usepackage[arrow,curve,poly,arc,2cell,frame,web]{xypic}

% there are many more packages, add them here as you need them

% define commands here
\newcommand{\br}{[\![}
\newcommand{\rb}{]\!]}
\newcommand{\oq}{\text{``}}
\newcommand{\cq}{\text{''}}


\newcommand{\im}{\mathbf{Im}}
\newcommand{\dom}{\mathbf{Dom}}


\newcommand{\Or}{\vee}
\newcommand{\Implies}{\Rightarrow}
\newcommand{\Iff}{\Leftrightarrow}
\newcommand{\proves}{\vdash}
\renewcommand{\And}{\wedge}
\newcommand{\Sup}{\bigwedge}
\newcommand{\Inf}{\bigvee}
\newcommand{\Z}{\mathbb{Z}}
\newcommand{\F}{\mathbb{F}}
\newcommand{\Q}{\mathbb{Q}}
\newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}}
\newcommand{\C}{\mathbb{C}}
\newcommand{\Nat}{\mathbb{N}}
\newcommand{\M}{\mathfrak{M}}
\newcommand{\N}{\mathfrak{N}}
\newcommand{\A}{\mathfrak{A}}
\newcommand{\B}{\mathfrak{B}}
\newcommand{\K}{\mathfrak{K}}
\newcommand{\G}{\mathbb{G}}
\newcommand{\Def}{\overset{\operatorname{def}}{:=}}



\newcommand{\spec}{\text{{\bf Spec}}}
\newcommand{\stab}{\text{{\bf Stab}}}
\newcommand{\ann}{\text{{\bf Ann}}}
\newcommand{\irr}{\text{{\bf Irr}}}
\newcommand{\qt}{\text{{\bf Qt}}}
\newcommand{\st}{\mathcal{Qt}}
\newcommand{\ro}{\mathbf{r.o.}}


\newcommand{\Endo}{\text{{\bf End}}}
\newcommand{\mat}{\text{{\bf Mat}}}
\newcommand{\der}{\text{{\bf Der}}}
\newcommand{\rad}{\text{{\bf Rad}}}
\newcommand{\trd}{\text{{\bf tr.d.}}}
\newcommand{\cl}{\text{{\bf acl}}}
\newcommand{\Int}{\text{{\bf int}}}
\newcommand{\V}{\mathbb{V}}
\newcommand{\D}{\mathbf{D}}

\newcommand{\del}{\partial}
\renewcommand{\O}{\mathcal{O}}
\newcommand{\aut}{\mathbf{Aut}}
\newcommand{\height}{\text{\bf Height}}
\newcommand{\coheight}{\text{\bf Co-height}}

\newcommand{\lcm}{\operatorname{lcm}}

\newcommand{\Gal}{\operatorname{Gal}}
\newcommand{\x}{\mathbf{x}}
\newcommand{\y}{\mathbf{y}}
\newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1|#2\rangle}
\renewcommand{\r}{{r}}
\renewcommand{\t}{{t}}

\newcommand{\restr}{\upharpoonright}
\newcommand{\Matrix}[4]{\left(\begin{array}{cc} #1 & #2 \\ #3 & #4
\end{array}\right)}
Content:

Let $L$ be a first-order language. A {\bf theory} in $L$ is a set of sentences of $L$, i.e. a set of formulas of $L$ that have no free variables.

{\bf Definition.} A theory $T$ is said to be {\bf consistent} if and only if $T\not\proves\perp$, where $\perp$ stands for ``false''. In other words, $T$ is consistent if one cannot derive a contradiction from it. If $\varphi$ is a sentence of $L$, then we say $\varphi$ is {\bf consistent with $T$} if and only if the theory $T\cup\{\varphi\}$ is consistent.

{\bf Definition.} A theory $T\subseteq L$ is said to be complete if and only if for every formula $\varphi\in L$, either $T\proves\varphi$ or $T\proves\neg\varphi$.

{\bf Lemma.} A theory $T$ in $L$ is complete if and only if it is maximal consistent. In other words, $T$ is complete if and only if for every $\varphi\not\in T$, $T\cup\{\varphi\}$ is inconsistent.

{\bf Theorem. (Tarski)} Every consistent theory $T$ in $L$ can be extended to a complete theory.

{\bf Proof :} Use Zorn's lemma on the collection of consistent theory extending $T$.\hfill$\diamondsuit$