PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Viewing Version 1 of 'frequently in'
[ view 'frequently in' | back to history ]

Title of object: frequently in
Canonical Name: FrequentlyIn
Type: Definition

Created on: 2007-06-12 00:20:24
Modified on: 2007-06-12 00:20:24

Creator: CWoo
Modifier: CWoo
Author: CWoo

Classification: msc:03E04
Defines: cluster point of a net

Preamble:

\usepackage{amssymb,amscd}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}

% used for TeXing text within eps files
%\usepackage{psfrag}
% need this for including graphics (\includegraphics)
%\usepackage{graphicx}
% for neatly defining theorems and propositions
\usepackage{amsthm}
% making logically defined graphics
\usepackage{xypic}
\usepackage{pst-plot}
\usepackage{psfrag}

% define commands here
\newtheorem{prop}{Proposition}
\newtheorem{thm}{Theorem}
\newtheorem{ex}{Example}
\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb{R}}
\newcommand{\pdiff}[2]{\frac{\partial #1}{\partial #2}}
\newcommand{\mpdiff}[3]{\frac{\partial^#1 #2}{\partial #3^#1}}
Content:

Recall that a net is a function $x$ from a directed set $D$ to a set $X$. The value of $x$ at $i\in D$ is usually denoted by $x_i$. Let $A$ be a subset of $X$. We say that a net $x$ is \emph{frequently in} $A$ if for every $i\in D$, there is a $j\in D$ such that $i\le j$ and $x_j\in A$.

Suppose a net $x$ is frequently in $A\subseteq X$. Let $E:=\lbrace j\in D\mid x_j\in A\rbrace$. Then $E$ is a cofinal subset of $D$, for if $i\in D$, then by definition of $A$, there is $i\le j\in D$ such that $x_j\in A$, and therefore $j\in E$.

The notion of ``frequently in'' is related to the notion of ``eventually in'' in the following sense: a net $x$ is eventually in a set $A\subseteq X$ iff it is not frequently in $A^{\complement}$, its complement. Suppose $x$ is eventually in $A$. There is $j\in D$ such that $x_k\in A$ for all $k\ge j$, or equivalently, $x_k\in A^{\complement}$ for no $k\ge j$. The converse is can be argued by tracing the previous statements backwards.

In a topological space $X$, a point $a\in X$ is said to be a \emph{cluster point of a net} $x$ if $x$ is frequently in every neighborhood of $a$. In this general definition, a limit point is always a cluster point. But a cluster point need not be a limit point. As an example, take the sequence $0,2,0,4,0,6,0,8,\ldots,0,2n,0,\ldots$ has $0$ as a cluster point. But clearly $0$ is not a limit point, as the sequence diverges in $\mathbb{R}$.