alternative proof of Euclid’s lemma


We give an alternative proof (see Euclid’s lemma proof), which does not use the Fundamental Theorem of ArithmeticMathworldPlanetmath (since, usually, Euclid’s lemma is used to prove FTA).

Lemma 1.

If a∣bc and gcd⁡(a,b)=1 then a∣c.

Proof.

By assumptionPlanetmathPlanetmath gcd⁡(a,b)=1, thus we can use Bezout’s lemma to find integers x,y such that a⁢x+b⁢y=1. Hence c⋅(a⁢x+b⁢y)=c and a⁢c⁢x+b⁢c⁢y=c. Since a∣a and a∣bc (by hypothesis), we conclude that a∣acx+bcy=c as claimed. ∎

Title alternative proof of Euclid’s lemma
Canonical name AlternativeProofOfEuclidsLemma
Date of creation 2013-03-22 14:12:27
Last modified on 2013-03-22 14:12:27
Owner alozano (2414)
Last modified by alozano (2414)
Numerical id 4
Author alozano (2414)
Entry type Proof
Classification msc 11A05