consequence operator determined by a class of subsets
Theorem 1.
Let be a set and let be a subset of . The the mapping defined as is a consequence operator.
Proof.
We need to check that satisfies the defining properties.
Property 1: Since every element of the set contains , we have .
Property 2: For every element of such that , it also is the case that because an intersection of a family of sets is a subset of any member of the family. In other words (or rather, symbols),
hence . By the first property proven above, so . Thus, .
Property 3: Let and be two subsets of such that . Then if, for some other subset of , we have , it follows that . Hence,
so .
∎
Title | consequence operator determined by a class of subsets |
---|---|
Canonical name | ConsequenceOperatorDeterminedByAClassOfSubsets |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 16:29:45 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 16:29:45 |
Owner | rspuzio (6075) |
Last modified by | rspuzio (6075) |
Numerical id | 10 |
Author | rspuzio (6075) |
Entry type | Theorem |
Classification | msc 03G25 |
Classification | msc 03G10 |
Classification | msc 03B22 |