## You are here

HomeDirac delta function

## Primary tabs

# Dirac delta function

The Dirac delta “function” $\delta(x)$, or *distribution* is not a true function because it is not uniquely defined for all values of the argument $x$. Similar to the Kronecker delta symbol, the notation $\delta(x)$ stands for

$\delta(x)=0\;\text{for}\;x\neq 0,\;\text{and}\;\int_{{-\infty}}^{\infty}\delta% (x)dx=1$ |

For any continuous function $F$:

$\int_{{-\infty}}^{\infty}\delta(x)F(x)dx=F(0)$ |

or in $n$ dimensions:

$\int_{{\mathbb{R}^{n}}}\delta(x-s)f(s)\,d^{n}s=f(x)$ |

$\delta(x)$ can also be defined as a normalized Gaussian function (normal distribution) in the limit of zero width.

Notes:
However, the limit of the normalized Gaussian function is still meaningless as a function, but some people still write such a limit as being equal to the Dirac distribution considered above in the first paragraph.

An example of how the Dirac distribution arises in a physical, classical context is available
on line.

Remarks: Distributions play important roles in Dirac’s formulation of quantum mechanics.

# References

- 1 W. Rudin, Functional Analysis, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1973.
- 2 L. Hörmander, The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators I, (Distribution theory and Fourier Analysis), 2nd ed, Springer-Verlag, 1990.
- 3 Originally from The Data Analysis Briefbook (http://rkb.home.cern.ch/rkb/titleA.html)

## Mathematics Subject Classification

34L40*no label found*

- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)

- Other useful stuff

## Recent Activity

new question: Prime numbers out of sequence by Rubens373

Oct 7

new question: Lorenz system by David Bankom

Oct 19

new correction: examples and OEIS sequences by fizzie

Oct 13

new correction: Define Galois correspondence by porton

Oct 7

new correction: Closure properties on languages: DCFL not closed under reversal by babou

new correction: DCFLs are not closed under reversal by petey

Oct 2

new correction: Many corrections by Smarandache

Sep 28

new question: how to contest an entry? by zorba

new question: simple question by parag