ergodicity of a map in terms of its induced operator
Theorem - Let be a probability space and a measure-preserving transformation. The following statements are equivalent:
-
1.
- is ergodic.
-
2.
- If is a measurable function and a.e. (http://planetmath.org/AlmostSurely), then is constant a.e.
-
3.
- If is a measurable function and a.e., then is constant a.e.
-
4.
- If and a.e., then is constant a.e..
-
5.
- If , with , and a.e., then is constant a.e.
Let denote the operator induced by (http://planetmath.org/OperatorInducedByAMeasurePreservingMap), i.e. the operator defined by . The statements above are statements about . The above theorem can be rewritten as follows:
Theorem - Let be a probability space and a measure-preserving transformation. The following statements are equivalent:
-
1.
- is ergodic.
-
2.
- The only fixed points of are the functions that are constant a.e.
-
3.
- If a measurable function and a.e., then is constant a.e.
-
4.
- The eigenspace of (seen as an operator in , with ) associated with the eigenvalue , is one-dimensional and consists of functions that are constant a.e.
Title | ergodicity of a map in terms of its induced operator |
---|---|
Canonical name | ErgodicityOfAMapInTermsOfItsInducedOperator |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 17:59:22 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 17:59:22 |
Owner | asteroid (17536) |
Last modified by | asteroid (17536) |
Numerical id | 6 |
Author | asteroid (17536) |
Entry type | Theorem |
Classification | msc 47A35 |
Classification | msc 37A30 |
Classification | msc 37A25 |
Classification | msc 28D05 |