You are here
Homegraph minor theorem
Primary tabs
graph minor theorem
If $(G_{k})_{{k\in\mathbb{N}}}$ is an infinite sequence of finite graphs, then there exist two numbers $m<n$ such that $G_{m}$ is isomorphic to a minor of $G_{n}$.
This theorem is often referred to as the deepest result in graph theory. It was proven by Robertson and Seymour in 1988 as the culminating result of a long series of articles, and the proof was recently published in the Journal of Combinatorial Theory series B. It resolves Wagner’s conjecture in the affirmative and leads to an important generalization of Kuratowski’s theorem.
Specifically, to every set $\cal{G}$ of finite graphs which is closed under taking minors (meaning if $G\in\cal{G}$ and $H$ is isomorphic to a minor of $G$, then $H\in\cal{G}$) there exist finitely many graphs $G_{1},\ldots,G_{n}$ such that $\cal{G}$ consists precisely of those finite graphs that do not have a minor isomorphic to one of the $G_{i}$. The graphs $G_{1},\ldots,G_{n}$ are often referred to as the forbidden minors for the class $\cal{G}$.
0.1 References

Neil Robertson and P.D. Seymour. Graph Minors XX: Wagner’s conjecture. Journal of Combinatorial Theory B, Volume 92, Issue 2, November 2004, Pages 325357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jctb.2004.08.001
Mathematics Subject Classification
05C99 no label found Forums
 Planetary Bugs
 HS/Secondary
 University/Tertiary
 Graduate/Advanced
 Industry/Practice
 Research Topics
 LaTeX help
 Math Comptetitions
 Math History
 Math Humor
 PlanetMath Comments
 PlanetMath System Updates and News
 PlanetMath help
 PlanetMath.ORG
 Strategic Communications Development
 The Math Pub
 Testing messages (ignore)
 Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new correction: Error in proof of Proposition 2 by alex2907
Jun 24
new question: A good question by Ron Castillo
Jun 23
new question: A trascendental number. by Ron Castillo
Jun 19
new question: Banach lattice valued Bochner integrals by math ias
Jun 13
new question: young tableau and young projectors by zmth
Jun 11
new question: binomial coefficients: is this a known relation? by pfb