## You are here

Homeinfimum

## Primary tabs

# infimum

The *infimum* of a set $S$ is the greatest lower bound of $S$ and is denoted $\inf(S)$.

Let $A$ be a set with a partial order $\leq$, and let $S\subseteq A$. For any $x\in A$, $x$ is a lower bound of $S$ if $x\leq y$ for any $y\in S$. The infimum of $S$, denoted $\inf(S)$, is the greatest such lower bound; that is, if $b$ is a lower bound of $S$, then $b\leq\inf(S)$.

Note that it is not necessarily the case that $\inf(S)\in S$. Suppose $S=(0,1)$; then $\inf(S)=0$, but $0\not\in S$.

Also note that a set does not necessarily have an infimum. See the attachments to this entry for examples.

Keywords:

real analysis

Related:

Supremum, LebesgueOuterMeasure, MinimalAndMaximalNumber, InfimumAndSupremumForRealNumbers, NondecreasingSequenceWithUpperBound

Type of Math Object:

Definition

Major Section:

Reference

## Mathematics Subject Classification

06A06*no label found*03D20

*no label found*

- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)

- Other useful stuff

## Recent Activity

Jul 5

new correction: Error in proof of Proposition 2 by alex2907

Jun 24

new question: A good question by Ron Castillo

Jun 23

new question: A trascendental number. by Ron Castillo

Jun 19

new question: Banach lattice valued Bochner integrals by math ias

new correction: Error in proof of Proposition 2 by alex2907

Jun 24

new question: A good question by Ron Castillo

Jun 23

new question: A trascendental number. by Ron Castillo

Jun 19

new question: Banach lattice valued Bochner integrals by math ias