You are here
Home ›list of common limits
Primary tabs
list of common limits
Following is a list of common limits used in elementary calculus:
-
For any real numbers and , .
-
(proven here)
-
(proven here)
-
(proven here)
-
(proven here)
-
For , (proven here).
-
For and any real number, (proven here).
-
(proven here)
-
(proven here)
-
(proven here)
-
(proven here)
-
-
-
(power of , l’Hôpital’s rule)
-
(proven here)
-
For and a positive integer, .
-
(by l’Hôpital’s rule)
-
For ,
-
(by l’Hôpital’s rule)
That is, , which indicates orthogonality of the slopes represented by those functions. -
For real (or complex), (proven here for real ).
Feel free to add! Also, if the limit you decide to add is proven somewhere on PlanetMath, please provide a link. Thanks.
References
- 1 Catherine Roberts & Ray McLenaghan, “Continuous Mathematics” in Standard Mathematical Tables and Formulae ed. Daniel Zwillinger. Boca Raton: CRC Press (1996): 333, 5.1 Differential Calculus
Related:
LimitRulesOfFunctions, ImproperLimits, LimitExamples, HalleysFormula
Type of Math Object:
Feature
Major Section:
Reference
Groups audience:
Mathematics Subject Classification
26A06 One-variable calculus26A03 Foundations: limits and generalizations, elementary topology of the line
26-00 General reference works (handbooks, dictionaries, bibliographies, etc.)
- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
May 22
new question: Linear Algebra Combination Problem! by unlord
new question: Computation of $\varphi(2000)$ by jeremyboden
new question: Computation of $\varphi(2000)$ by jeremyboden
May 21
new question: pure subgroups by lvoyster
new correction: Typo in M\"obius function? by Aleph Zero
new collection: analytic number theory by Aleph Zero
May 20
new question: Taylor's Series Query! by unlord
new question: Laplace transform by J
new question: Residue Calculus by J
May 19
new Education: Project: PlanetMath Outlines Series by unlord
new question: Linear Algebra Combination Problem! by unlord
new question: Computation of $\varphi(2000)$ by jeremyboden
new question: Computation of $\varphi(2000)$ by jeremyboden
May 21
new question: pure subgroups by lvoyster
new correction: Typo in M\"obius function? by Aleph Zero
new collection: analytic number theory by Aleph Zero
May 20
new question: Taylor's Series Query! by unlord
new question: Laplace transform by J
new question: Residue Calculus by J
May 19
new Education: Project: PlanetMath Outlines Series by unlord



Comments
Excellent entry
This is an excellent entry! Though it might not be complete (even if we take "common" to mean "quintessential"), already it shows that calculus can be about actual numbers people know and care about, like 1/2 and pi.
Re: Excellent entry
Thanks, Lisa! Interessant, that the people first did not know what kind of limits one could list there.
Up to now, only Warren and I have added those limits -- we wish that also other people could increase the list =o)
Jussi
What kinds of limits are common?
that the people first did not know what kind of limits one could list there ... we wish that also other people could increase the list =o)
They might still not know, they might have questions. Mine is: does Euler's gamma function expressed as a limit belong in here?
Re: What kinds of limits are common?
I'd say the limit should be there, and the proof elsewhere. If the article becomes too long in the future I'm sure it can be broken into subsection and subentries. Until then, why not add away?
Re: What kinds of limits are common?
I think this is an issue of intended audience. Presumably, the
more elementary identities are meant for the benefit of calculus
students seeing limits for the first time. Encountering yet
unfamiliar material such as gamma functions mixed in with the
elementary material can be disconcerting because it can makes one
unsure whether one has the necessary background to understand
even the elementary material. Therefore, I would suggest that
you add the limits involving gamma functions towards the end of
the list, after the more elementary ones. It might also be good to
split up the limits under headings such as "algebraic", "power",
"exponential", "trigonometric", "higher transcendents" for
ease of reference and further clarifying required background.
I think that if you include the gamma limits this way, the likely
result will be that beginners will view the advanced results as
something new, exciting, and mysterious to look ahead to rather
than as a confusing nuisance.