## You are here

Homenon-deterministic Turing machine

## Primary tabs

# non-deterministic Turing machine

The definition of a non-deterministic Turing machine is the same as the definition of a deterministic Turing machine except that $\delta$ is a relation, not a function. Hence, for any particular state and symbol, there may be multiple possible legal moves.

If $S\in\Gamma^{+}$ we say $T$ accepts $S$ if, when $S$ is the input, there is some finite sequence of legal moves such that $\delta$ is undefined on the state and symbol pair which results from the last move in the sequence and such that the final state is an element of $F$. If $T$ does not accept $S$ then it rejects $S$.

An alternative definition of a non-deterministic Turing machine is as a deterministic Turing machine with an extra one-way, read-only tape, the guess tape. Then we say $T$ accepts $S$ if there is any string $c(S)$ such that, when $c(S)$ is placed on the guess tape, $T$ accepts $S$. We call $c(S)$ a *certificate* for $S$, and otherwise that it rejects $S$. In some cases the guess tape is allowed to be two-way; this generates different time and space complexity classes than the one-way case (the one-way case is equivalent to the original definition).

## Mathematics Subject Classification

68Q05*no label found*

- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)

- Other useful stuff

## Recent Activity

new question: Prime numbers out of sequence by Rubens373

Oct 7

new question: Lorenz system by David Bankom

Oct 19

new correction: examples and OEIS sequences by fizzie

Oct 13

new correction: Define Galois correspondence by porton

Oct 7

new correction: Closure properties on languages: DCFL not closed under reversal by babou

new correction: DCFLs are not closed under reversal by petey

Oct 2

new correction: Many corrections by Smarandache

Sep 28

new question: how to contest an entry? by zorba

new question: simple question by parag