You are here
Home ›notes on the classical definition of a manifold
Primary tabs
notes on the classical definition of a manifold
Classical Definition
Historically, the data for a manifold was specified as a collection of coordinate domains related by changes of coordinates. The manifold itself could be obtained by gluing the domains in accordance with the transition functions, provided the changes of coordinates were free of inconsistencies.
In this formulation, a manifold is specified by two types of information. The first item of information is a collection of open sets
indexed by some set . The second item is a collection of transition functions, that is to say diffeomorphisms
obeying certain consistency and topological conditions.
We call a pair
the coordinates of a point relative to chart , and define the manifold to be the set of equivalence classes of such pairs modulo the relation
To ensure that the above is an equivalence relation we impose the following hypotheses.
-
For , the transition function is the identity on .
-
For the transition functions and are inverses.
-
For we have for a suitably restricted domain
We topologize with the least coarse topology that will make the mappings from each to continuous. Finally, we demand that the resulting topological space be paracompact and Hausdorff.
0.0.1 Notes
To understand the role played by the notion of a differential manifold, one has to go back to classical differential geometry, which dealt with geometric objects such as curves and surface only in reference to some ambient geometric setting — typically a 2-dimensional plane or 3-dimensional space. Roughly speaking, the concept of a manifold was created in order to treat the intrinsic geometry of such an object, independent of any embedding. The motivation for a theory of intrinsic geometry can be seen in results such as Gauss’s famous Theorema Egregium, that showed that a certain geometric property of a surface, namely the scalar curvature, was fully determined by intrinsic metric properties of the surface, and was independent of any particular embedding. Riemann [1] took this idea further in his habilitation lecture by describing intrinsic metric geometry of -dimensional space without recourse to an ambient Euclidean setting. The modern notion of manifold, as a general setting for geometry involving differential properties evolved early in the twentieth century from works of mathematicians such as Hermann Weyl [3], who introduced the ideas of an atlas and transition functions, and Elie Cartan, who investigation global properties and geometric structures on differential manifolds. The modern definition of a manifold was introduced by Hassler Whitney [4] (For more foundational information, follow this link to some old notes by Matthew Frank ).
References
- 1 Riemann, B., “Über die Hypothesen welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen (On the hypotheses that lie at the foundations of geometry)” in M. Spivak, A comprehensive introduction to differential geometry, vol. II.
- 2 Spivak, M., A comprehensive introduction to differential geometry, vols I & II.
- 3 Weyl, H., The concept of a Riemann surface, 1913
- 4 Whitney, H., Differentiable Manifolds, Annals of Mathematics, 1936.
Mathematics Subject Classification
53-03 Historical concerning 53-XX- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new question: Sorry to steal a few minutes of your time for this question, but i honestly don't know what else to do. by Whrazithar
new question: equality of the determinants of submatrices of an orthogonal matrix by ismayli
Jun 11
new correction: Typo by suitangi
Jun 2
new question: Creating another set with same cardinality. by hkkass
Jun 1
new image: ProblemOneRevised by unlord
new Education: Chapter II by rspuzio
May 31
new collection: The Calculus by Davis and Brenke by rspuzio
new question: Proofs by weixifan
new question: Summation Integration Question by trevor.nickle
May 27
new correction: typo+finite measure hypothesis by Filipe


