You are here
Home ›projective space
Primary tabs
projective space
Projective space and homogeneous coordinates.
Let be a field. Projective space of dimension over , typically denoted by , is the set of lines passing through the origin in . More formally, consider the equivalence relation on the set of non-zero points defined by
Projective space is defined to be the set of the corresponding equivalence classes.
Every determines an element of projective space, namely the line passing through . Formally, this line is the equivalence class , or , as it is commonly denoted. The numbers are referred to as homogeneous coordinates of the line. Homogeneous coordinates differ from ordinary coordinate systems in that a given element of projective space is labeled by multiple homogeneous “coordinates”.
Affine coordinates.
Projective space also admits a more conventional type of coordinate system, called affine coordinates. Let be the subset of all elements such that . We then define the functions
according to
where is any element of the equivalence class representing . This definition makes sense because other elements of the same equivalence class have the form
for some non-zero , and hence
The functions are called affine coordinates relative to the hyperplane
Geometrically, affine coordinates can be described by saying that the elements of are lines in that are not parallel to , and that every such line intersects in one and exactly one point. Conversely points of are represented by tuples with , and each such point uniquely labels a line in .
It must be noted that a single system of affine coordinates does not cover all of projective space. However, it is possible to define a system of affine coordinates relative to every hyperplane in that does not contain the origin. In particular, we get different systems of affine coordinates corresponding to the hyperplanes Every element of projective space is covered by at least one of these systems of coordinates.
Projective automorphisms.
A projective automorphism, also known as a projectivity, is a bijective transformation of projective space that preserves all incidence relations. For , every automorphism of is engendered by a semilinear invertible transformation of . Let be an invertible semilinear transformation. The corresponding projectivity is the transformation
For every non-zero the transformation gives the same projective automorphism as . For this reason, it is convenient we identify the group of projective automorphisms with the quotient
Here refers to the group of invertible semi-linear transformations, while the quotienting refers to the subgroup of scalar multiplications.
A collineation is a special kind of projective automorphism, one that is engendered by a strictly linear transformation. The group of projective collineations is therefore denoted by Note that for fields such as and , the group of projective collineations is also described by the projectivizations , of the corresponding unimodular group.
Also note that if a field, such as , lacks non-trivial automorphisms, then all semi-linear transformations are linear. For such fields all projective automorphisms are collineations. Thus,
By contrast, since possesses non-trivial automorphisms, complex conjugation for example, the group of automorphisms of complex projective space is larger than , where the latter denotes the quotient of by the subgroup of scalings by the st roots of unity.
Mathematics Subject Classification
14-00 General reference works (handbooks, dictionaries, bibliographies, etc.)- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new question: Sorry to steal a few minutes of your time for this question, but i honestly don't know what else to do. by Whrazithar
new question: equality of the determinants of submatrices of an orthogonal matrix by ismayli
Jun 11
new correction: Typo by suitangi
Jun 2
new question: Creating another set with same cardinality. by hkkass
Jun 1
new image: ProblemOneRevised by unlord
new Education: Chapter II by rspuzio
May 31
new collection: The Calculus by Davis and Brenke by rspuzio
new question: Proofs by weixifan
new question: Summation Integration Question by trevor.nickle
May 27
new correction: typo+finite measure hypothesis by Filipe


