proof of Hadamard’s inequality


Let’s first prove the second inequality. If A is singular, the thesis is trivially verified, since for a Hermitian positive semidefinite matrix the right-hand side is always nonnegative, all the diagonalMathworldPlanetmath entries being nonnegative. Let’s thus assume det⁡(A)≠0, which means, A being Hermitian positive semidefinitePlanetmathPlanetmath, det⁡(A)>0. Then no diagonal entry of A can be 0 (otherwise, since for a Hermitian positive semidefinite matrix, 0≤λm⁢i⁢n≤ai⁢i≤λm⁢a⁢x, λm⁢i⁢n and λm⁢a⁢x being respectively the minimal and the maximal eigenvalueMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath, this would imply λm⁢i⁢n=0, that is A is singular); for this reason we can define D=d⁢i⁢a⁢g⁢(d11,d22,…,dn⁢n), with di⁢i=ai⁢i-12∈ℝ, since all ai⁢i∈ℝ+. Let’s furthermore define B=D⁢A⁢D. It’s easy to check that B too is Hermitian positive semidefinite, so its eigenvalues λB are all non-negative (actually, since A=AH and since D is real and diagonal, BH=(D⁢A⁢D)H=DH⁢(D⁢A)H=DH⁢AH⁢DH=D⁢A⁢D=B; on the other hand, for any 𝐱≠𝟎, 𝐱H⁢B⁢𝐱=𝐱H⁢D⁢A⁢D⁢𝐱=(𝐱H⁢D)⁢A⁢(D⁢𝐱)=(DH⁢𝐱)H⁢A⁢(D⁢𝐱)=(D⁢𝐱)H⁢A⁢(D⁢𝐱)=𝐲H⁢A⁢𝐲≥0). Moreover, we have obviously bi⁢i=di⁢i⁢ai⁢i⁢di⁢i=1 so that t⁢r⁢(B)=n and, recalling the geometric-arithmetic mean inequality (http://planetmath.org/ArithmeticGeometricMeansInequality), which holds in this case because the eigenvalues of B are all non-negative,

det⁡(B)=∏i=1nλB(i)≤(1n⁢∑i=1nλB(i))n=(1n⁢t⁢r⁢(B))n=1,

and since det⁡(B)=det⁡(D)2⁢det⁡(A)=(∏i=1nai⁢i)-1⁢det⁡(A), we have the thesis. Since det⁡(A)=∏i=1nai⁢i if and only if det⁡(B)=1 and since in the geometric-arithmetic inequality equality holds if and only if all terms are equal, we must have λB(i)=λB, so that ∏i=1nλB(i)=λBn=1, whence λB=1 (λB having to be non-negative), and since B is Hermitian and hence is diagonalizable, we obtain B=I, and so A=D-1⁢B⁢D-1=D-2=d⁢i⁢a⁢g⁢(a11,a22,…,an⁢n). So we can conclude that equality holds if and only if A is diagonal.

Let’s now derive the more general first inequality. Let A be a complex-valued n×n matrix. If A is singular, the thesis is trivially verified. Let’s thus assume det⁡(A)≠0; then B=A⁢AH is a Hermitian positive semidefinite matrix (actually, BH=(A⁢AH)H=(AH)H⁢AH=A⁢AH=B and, for any 𝐱≠𝟎,𝐱H⁢B⁢𝐱=𝐱H⁢A⁢AH⁢𝐱=(𝐱H⁢A)⁢(AH⁢𝐱)=(AH⁢𝐱)H⁢(AH⁢𝐱)=𝐲H⁢𝐲=∥𝐲∥22≥0). Therefore, the second inequality can be applied to B, yielding:

|det⁡(A)|2=det⁡(A)⁢det∗⁡(A)=det⁡(A)⁢det⁡(AH)=det⁡(A⁢AH)=
=det⁡(B)≤∏i=1nbi⁢i=∏i=1n∑j=1nai⁢j⁢(aH)j⁢i=∏i=1n∑j=1nai⁢j⁢ai⁢j∗=∏i=1n∑j=1n|ai⁢j|2.

As we proved above, for det⁡(B) to be equal to ∏i=1nbi⁢i, B must be diagonal, which means that ∑k=1nai⁢k⁢aj⁢k∗=|ai⁢i|2⁢δi⁢j. So we can conclude that equality holds if and only if the rows of A are orthogonalMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath. □

References

  • 1 R. A. Horn, C. R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis, Cambridge University Press, 1985
Title proof of Hadamard’s inequality
Canonical name ProofOfHadamardsInequality
Date of creation 2013-03-22 15:37:02
Last modified on 2013-03-22 15:37:02
Owner Andrea Ambrosio (7332)
Last modified by Andrea Ambrosio (7332)
Numerical id 17
Author Andrea Ambrosio (7332)
Entry type Proof
Classification msc 15A45