proof of prime ideal decomposition in quadratic extensions of ℚ


Much of the proof of this theorem is given in Marcus’ Number FieldsMathworldPlanetmath (http://planetmath.org/NumberField); however, all of the details will be filled in here, and some aspects of the proof here will differ from those of Marcus.

Note that gcd⁡(a,b) refers to the greatest common divisorMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath in Z of a and b (which must necessarily be rational integers).

Proof.

Let d be a squarefreeMathworldPlanetmath integer with d≠1 and K=ℚ⁢(d).

If p is a rational prime that divides d, then

⟨p,d⟩2=⟨p2,p⁢d,d⟩=⟨gcd⁡(p2,d),p⁢d⟩=⟨p,p⁢d⟩=⟨p⟩=p⁢𝒪K.

Note that ⟨p,d⟩≠𝒪K. (If they were equal, then ⟨p,d⟩2 would equal 𝒪K.)

If d≡3⁢mod⁡4, then disc⁡(K)=4⁢d. Note that 2 divides disc⁡(K). Thus, 2 ramifies in 𝒪K. Therefore, 2⁢𝒪K=P2 for some prime idealPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath P of 𝒪K. Moreover, P is the unique ideal of 𝒪K of norm (http://planetmath.org/IdealNorm) 2. Since d≡-1⁢mod⁡⟨2,1+d⟩, then

𝒪K/⟨2,1+d⟩={a+b⁢d+⟨2,1+d⟩:a,b∈ℤ}={a-b+⟨2,1+d⟩:a,b∈ℤ}={0+⟨2,1+d⟩,1+⟨2,1+d⟩}.

Since ⟨2,1+d⟩ has 2, it follows that P=⟨2,1+d⟩ and 2⁢𝒪K=⟨2,1+d⟩2.

If d≡1⁢mod⁡8, then disc⁡(K)=d. Note that 2 does not divide disc⁡(K). Thus, 2 does not ramify in 𝒪K. Since

⟨2,1+d2⟩⁢⟨2,1-d2⟩=⟨4,1+d,1-d,1-d4⟩=⟨4,2,2⁢(1-d2),1-d4⟩=⟨2⟩=2⁢𝒪K,

we have that ⟨2,1+d2⟩ and ⟨2,1-d2⟩ must be distinct. Proving that these ideals are indeed given below.

If d≡5⁢mod⁡8, then consider the minimal polynomialPlanetmathPlanetmath f⁢(x)∈ℤ⁢[x] for 1+d2. Since 1+d2∉ℚ, it must be the case that deg⁡f≥2.

α=1+d22⁢α-1=d(2⁢α-1)2=d4⁢α2-4⁢α+1=d4⁢α2-4⁢α+1-d=0α2-α+1-d4=0

Thus, f⁢(x)=x2-x+1-d4.

Let P be a lying over 2 in 𝒪K. Note that f⁢(x) has a root (http://planetmath.org/Root) in 𝒪K and thus in 𝒪K/P. On the other hand, since f⁢(x)≡x2+x+1⁢mod⁡2, f⁢(x) considered as an element of 𝔽2⁢[x] has no root in 𝔽2. Thus, 𝒪K/P and 𝔽2 are not isomorphic. Therefore, [𝒪K/P:𝔽2]>1. Since 1<[𝒪K/P:𝔽2]=f(P|2)≤[K:ℚ]=2, we have that f(P|2)=2. Thus, 2 is inert in 𝒪K. It follows that 2⁢𝒪K is in 𝒪K.

If p is an odd prime (http://planetmath.org/Prime) that does not divide d and d≡n2⁢mod⁡p, then p does not divide disc⁡(K) (which equals either d or 4⁢d). Thus, p does not ramify in 𝒪K. Also, p does not divide n. Since

⟨p,n+d⟩⁢⟨p,n-d⟩=⟨p2,p⁢n+p⁢d,p⁢n-p⁢d,n2-d⟩=⟨p2,2⁢p⁢n,p⁢n-p⁢d,n2-d⟩=⟨gcd⁡(p2,2⁢p⁢n),p⁢n-p⁢d,n2-d⟩=⟨p,p⁢n-p⁢d,n2-d⟩=⟨p⟩=p⁢𝒪K,

we have that ⟨p,n+d⟩ and ⟨p,n-d⟩ must be distinct. It will be proven that these ideals are indeed .

Let ∥I∥ denote the norm of the ideal I (http://planetmath.org/IdealNorm) of 𝒪K and σ∈Gal⁡(K/ℚ) with σ⁢(d)=-d. Then

∥⟨p,n+d⟩∥=σ⁢(∥⟨p,n+d⟩∥)=∥σ⁢(⟨p,n+d⟩)∥=∥⟨σ⁢(p),σ⁢(n+d)⟩∥=∥⟨p,n-d⟩∥.

Note that p2=∥p⁢𝒪K∥=∥⟨p,n+d⟩∥⁢∥⟨p,n-d⟩∥=∥⟨p,n-d⟩∥2. Therefore, ∥⟨p,n+d⟩∥=∥⟨p,n-d⟩∥=p. It follows that the indicated ideals are .

Finally, if p is an odd prime that does not divide d and d is not a square mod⁡p, then consider the minimal polynomial g⁢(x)=x2-d for d over ℚ. Let P be a lying over p in 𝒪K. Note that g⁢(x) has a root in 𝒪K and thus in 𝒪K/P. On the other hand, since disc⁡g⁢(x)=-4⁢(-d)=4⁢d, which is not a square in 𝔽p, then g⁢(x) considered as an element of 𝔽p⁢[x] has no root in 𝔽p. Thus, 𝒪K/P and 𝔽p are not isomorphic. Therefore, [𝒪K/P:𝔽p]>1. Note that 1<[𝒪K/P:𝔽p]=f(P|p)≤[K:ℚ]=2. Thus, f(P|p)=2. Therefore, p is inert in 𝒪K. It follows that p⁢𝒪K is in 𝒪K. ∎

References

  • 1 Marcus, Daniel A. Number Fields. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1977.
Title proof of prime ideal decomposition in quadratic extensions of ℚ
Canonical name ProofOfPrimeIdealDecompositionInQuadraticExtensionsOfmathbbQ
Date of creation 2013-03-22 15:59:06
Last modified on 2013-03-22 15:59:06
Owner Wkbj79 (1863)
Last modified by Wkbj79 (1863)
Numerical id 20
Author Wkbj79 (1863)
Entry type Proof
Classification msc 11R11