properties of set difference
Let be sets.
-
1.
. This is obvious by definition.
-
2.
Proof.
For the first equation, see here (http://planetmath.org/PropertiesOfComplement). The second equation comes from the first: . The last equation also follows from the first: . ∎
-
3.
iff .
Proof.
Since , . Then . On the other hand, suppose . Then by property 1, which means . ∎
-
4.
iff .
Proof.
Suppose first that . If , then , so , and hence . The equality is shown by applying property 1. Next suppose . If , then , so , which means , or . ∎
-
5.
and .
Proof.
The first equation follows from property 4 and the last two equations from property 3. ∎
-
6.
(de Morgan’s laws on set difference):
Proof.
These laws follow from property 2 and the de Morgan’s laws on set complement. For example, . The other equation is proved similarly. ∎
-
7.
.
Proof.
The first equation follows from property 6: by property 5. Next, , proving the second equation. ∎
-
8.
.
Proof.
Using property 2, we get . ∎
-
9.
.
Proof.
. ∎
-
10.
Proof.
Expanding the LHS, we get . Expanding the RHS, we get the same thing. ∎
-
11.
.
Proof.
Starting from the RHS: , where the last equality comes from property 10. ∎
Remarks.
-
1.
Many of the proofs above use the properties of the set complement. Please see this link (http://planetmath.org/PropertiesOfComplement) for more detail.
-
2.
All of the properties of on sets can be generalized to Boolean subtraction (http://planetmath.org/DerivedBooleanOperations) on Boolean algebras.
Title | properties of set difference |
---|---|
Canonical name | PropertiesOfSetDifference |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 17:55:35 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 17:55:35 |
Owner | CWoo (3771) |
Last modified by | CWoo (3771) |
Numerical id | 7 |
Author | CWoo (3771) |
Entry type | Derivation |
Classification | msc 03E20 |