You are here
Home ›quantum topos
Primary tabs
quantum topos
Preliminary Data.
There are several distinct definitions of quantum topos in the
Mathematical Physics literature attempting to redefine the quantum logic
that was first introduced by von Neumann and Birkhoff for the foundation
of Quantum Mechanics. The definitions of quantum topoi published so far
are not, however, those of ‘quantum’ categories (previously introduced as rigid monoidal categories)
- with finite limits and power objects.
Definition 0.1.
A quantum topos was defined as a general model, or representation of quantum state spaces (QST) in a topos with a (commutative) Heyting logic algebra as a subobject (quantum logic) classifier.The differences between the several published definitions of a quantum topos differ in the categorical representation in QST’ s, and in the choice of category, but not in the choice of quantum logic algebra that was selected as a standard, Heyting logic algebra (or Heyting algebra) which has a commutative Heyting lattice structure; this choice is at variance with the original quantum logic introduced by von Neumann and Birkhoff. Thus instead of the orthomodular lattice of Birkhoff and von Neumann, the recent definitions of quantum topoi postulate an intuitionistic- Brouwer logic corresponding to a pseudocomplemented and rel. pseudocomplemented lattice structure, as further explained in the next section.
0.1 Heyting Logic Concept and Algebraic Structure
Definition 0.2.
A Heyting lattice is a Brouwer-intuitionistic logic lattice with a bottom, or lowest element . In the more technical classification it is a commutative lattice which is both ‘pseudocomplemented and also relatively pseudocomplemented’. The concept of relative pseudocomplementation coincides with the material implication operator, , in symbolic propositional logic based on chryssippian or Boolean logic.
Definition 0.3.
A Heyting algebra is a p-algebra (as defined next in Definition 1.3 )
with the relative pseudocomplentation operation (which replaces the propositional implication ).
Given an element in a bounded lattice , a complement of is defined to be an element , if such an element exists, such that
To surmount the non-uniqueness of the complement, an alternative to the latter was defined– the pseudocomplement of an element.
An element in a lattice with is a pseudocomplement of if
1. 2. for any such that then .
In other words, is the maximal element in the set .
Definition 0.4.
A convenient modification of the pseudocomplemented (pc) lattice concept is a p-algebra (or pseudocomplemented algebra) which is a pc-lattice where is regarded as an algebraic operator. Thus, a morphism of pc–lattices is a proper lattice homomorphism, whereas a morphism between two p-algebras is a lattice homomorphism that also preserves the pc-algebraic operation , i.e., . One can therefore define a category of p-algebras by specifying the morphism between any pair of p-algebras (considered as objects of this algebraic logic category) as the -lattice homomorphism, with the following condition being also satisfied.
Remark Unlike the Heyting lattice, an -logic algebra has a non-commutative lattice structure and is therefore considered as a stronger candidate for quantum logics, including those based on the orthomodular lattices of the original quantum logic of Birkhoff and von Neumann. Thus, a generalized topos defined with a subobject classifier based on -logic algebra may provide suitable representations of arbitrary quantum state spaces.
References
- 1 Butterfield, J. and C. J. Isham: 2001, Space-time and the Philosophical Challenges of Quantum Gravity., in C. Callender and N. Hugget (eds. ) Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck scale., Cambridge University Press,pp.33–89.
- 2 Butterfield, J. and C. J. Isham: 1998, 1999, 2000–2002, A topos perspective on the Kochen–Specker theorem I - IV, Int. J. Theor. Phys, 37 No 11., 2669–2733 38 No 3., 827–859, 39 No 6., 1413–1436, 41 No 4., 613–639.
- 3
Mathematics Subject Classification
18D25 Strong functors, strong adjunctions18-00 General reference works (handbooks, dictionaries, bibliographies, etc.)
55U99 None of the above, but in MSC2010 section 55Uxx
81-00 General reference works (handbooks, dictionaries, bibliographies, etc.)
81P05 General and philosophical
81Q05 Closed and approximate solutions to the Schrödinger, Dirac, Klein-Gordon and other equations of quantum mechanics
- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new question: Linear Algebra Combination Problem! by unlord
new question: Computation of $\varphi(2000)$ by jeremyboden
new question: Computation of $\varphi(2000)$ by jeremyboden
May 21
new question: pure subgroups by lvoyster
new correction: Typo in M\"obius function? by Aleph Zero
new collection: analytic number theory by Aleph Zero
May 20
new question: Taylor's Series Query! by unlord
new question: Laplace transform by J
new question: Residue Calculus by J
May 19
new Education: Project: PlanetMath Outlines Series by unlord


