realization of a formula by a truth function
Fix a countable set of propositional variables. Let be a well-formed formula over constructed by a set of logical connectives. Let be the set of variables occurring in ( is finite as is a string of finite length). Fix the -tuple . Every valuation on , when restricted to , determines an -tupe of zeros and ones: . For this , we associate the interpretation .
Two valuations on determine the same iff they agree on every . If we set iff they determine the same , then is an equivalence relation on the set of all valuations on . As there are elements in , there are equivalence classes.
From the two paragraphs above, we see that there is a truth function such that
for any valuation on . This function is called a realization of the wff . Since is arbitrary, it is easy to see that every wff admits a realization. It is also not hard to see that a realization of is unique up to the order of the variables in the -tuple . From now only, we make the assumption that every -tuple has the property that . Let us write the realization of .
Realizations of wffs are closely related to semantical implications and equivalences:
-
1.
( semantically implies , or entails ) iff ;
-
2.
iff , where denotes semantical equivalence;
-
3.
is a tautology iff , the constant function whose value is .
If , then every wff over corresponds to a realization that “looks” exactly likes . We do this by induction:
-
•
if is a propositional variable , let be the identity function on ;
-
•
if has the form , define ;
-
•
if has the form , define ;
-
•
if has the form , define ;
where the and on the right hand side of the definitions are the Boolean complementation, join and meet operations on the Boolean algebra . Again by an easy induction, for each wff , the function is the realization of (a function written in terms of symbols in is called a polynomial).
Conversely, every -ary truth function is the realization of some wff . This is true because every -ary operation on has a conjunctive normal form. Suppose is a function in variables , with the form , where each is the join of the variables in . If is a function in (each ), then let be the disjunction of propositional variables . Then is the realization of wff . Notice that we have omitted parenthesis, and is an abbreviation of .
Since every wff, regardless of logical connectives, has a realization, what we have just proved in fact is the following:
Theorem 1.
References
- 1 H. Enderton: A Mathematical Introduction to Logic, Academic Press, San Diego (1972).
Title | realization of a formula by a truth function |
---|---|
Canonical name | RealizationOfAFormulaByATruthFunction |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 18:52:53 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 18:52:53 |
Owner | CWoo (3771) |
Last modified by | CWoo (3771) |
Numerical id | 8 |
Author | CWoo (3771) |
Entry type | Definition |
Classification | msc 03B05 |