structure of (ℤ/n⁢ℤ)× as an abelian group


The automorphism groupMathworldPlanetmath of the cyclic groupMathworldPlanetmath Cn≅ℤ/n⁢ℤ is (ℤ/n⁢ℤ)×. This article determines the structureMathworldPlanetmath of (ℤ/n⁢ℤ)× as an abelian groupMathworldPlanetmath.

Theorem 1.

Let n≥2 be an integer whose factorization is n=p1a1⁢p2a2⁢…⁢prar where the pi are distinct primes. Then:

  1. 1.

    (ℤ/n⁢ℤ)×≅(ℤ/p1a1⁢ℤ)××(ℤ/p2a2⁢ℤ)××…×(ℤ/prar⁢ℤ)×

  2. 2.

    (ℤ/pk⁢ℤ)× is a cyclic group of order pk-1⁢(p-1) for all odd primes p.

  3. 3.

    (ℤ/2k⁢ℤ)× is the direct productMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath of a cyclic group of order 2 and a cyclic group of order 2k-2 for k≥2.

Corollary 2.

Aut⁡(Cn)≅(ℤ/n⁢ℤ)× is cyclic if and only if n=2,4,pk, or 2⁢pk for p an odd prime and k≥0 an integer.

Proof.

(of theorem)
(1): This is a restatement of the Chinese Remainder TheoremMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath.

(2): Note first that the result is clear for k=1, since then (ℤ/p⁢ℤ)× is the multiplicative groupMathworldPlanetmath of the finite field ℤ/p⁢ℤ and thus is cyclic (any finite subgroup of the multiplicative group of a field is cyclic). Also, |(ℤ/pk⁢ℤ)×|=ϕ⁢(pk)=pk-1⁢(p-1). Since (ℤ/pk⁢ℤ)× is abelian, it is the direct product of its q-primary componentsPlanetmathPlanetmath for each prime q∣ϕ(pk); we will show that each of those q-primary components is cyclic. For q=p, it suffices to find an element of (ℤ/pk⁢ℤ)× of order pk-1. 1+p is such an element; see Lemma 3 below. For q≠p, consider the map

ℤ/pk⁢ℤ→ℤ/p⁢ℤ:a+(pk)↦a+(p)

i.e. the reduction-by-p map. This is a ring homomorphismMathworldPlanetmath; restricting it to (ℤ/pk⁢ℤ)× gives a surjectivePlanetmathPlanetmath group homomorphismMathworldPlanetmath π:(ℤ/pk⁢ℤ)×→(ℤ/p⁢ℤ)×. Since |(ℤ/p⁢ℤ)×|=p-1, it follows that the kernel of π has order pk-1. Thus for q≠p, the q-primary component of (ℤ/pk⁢ℤ)× must map isomorphically into (ℤ/p⁢ℤ)× by order considerations. But (ℤ/p⁢ℤ)× is cyclic, so the q-primary component is as well.

Thus each q-primary component of (ℤ/pk⁢ℤ)× is cyclic and thus (ℤ/pk⁢ℤ)× is also cyclic.

(3): The result is true for k=2, when (ℤ/22⁢ℤ)×≅V4, the Klein 4-group. So assume k≥3. 5 has exact order 2k-2 in (ℤ/2k⁢ℤ)× (see Lemma 4 below). Also by that lemma, 52k-3≠-1 is (ℤ/2k⁢ℤ)×, so that 52k-3 and -1 are two distinct elements of order 2. Thus (ℤ/2k⁢ℤ)× is not cyclic, but has a cyclic subgroup of order 2k-2; the result follows. ∎

Proof.

(of Corollary)
(⇐) is clear, since

(ℤ/C2⁢ℤ)×≅{1}(ℤ/C4⁢ℤ)×≅C2(ℤ/Cpk⁢ℤ)×≅Cpk-1⁢(p-1)(ℤ/C2⁢pk⁢ℤ)×≅(ℤ/C2⁢ℤ)××(ℤ/Cpk⁢ℤ)×≅Cpk-1⁢(p-1)

(⇒): Assume (ℤ/n⁢ℤ)× is cyclic. If n is a power of 2, then by the theorem, it must be either 2 or 4. Otherwise, if n has two distinct odd prime factors p,q, then (ℤ/n⁢ℤ)× contains the direct product (ℤ/pr⁢ℤ)××(ℤ/qs⁢ℤ)×. But the orders of these two factor groups are both even (they are ϕ⁢(pr)=pr-1⁢(p-1) and ϕ⁢(qs)=qs-1⁢(q-1) respectively), so their direct product is not cyclic. Thus n can have at most one odd prime as a factor, so that n=2m⁢pk for some integers m,k, and

(ℤ/Cn⁢ℤ)×=(ℤ/C2m⁢ℤ)××(ℤ/Cpk⁢ℤ)×

But the order of (ℤ/Cpk⁢ℤ)× is even, so that (since the order of (ℤ/C2m⁢ℤ)× is also even for m≥2) we must have m=0 or 1, so that n=pk or 2⁢pk.

∎

The above proof used the following lemmas, which we now prove:

Lemma 3.

Let p be an odd prime and k>0 a positive integer. Then 1+p has exact order pk-1 in the multiplicative group (Z/pk⁢Z)×.

Proof.

The result is obvious for k=1, so we assume k≥2. By the binomial theoremMathworldPlanetmath,

(1+p)pn=1+∑i=1pn(pni)⁢pi

Write ordp⁡(m) for the largest power of a prime p dividing m. Then by a theorem on divisibility of prime-power binomial coefficients,

ordp⁡((pni)⁢pi)=n+i-ordp⁡(i)

Now, i-ordp⁡(i) is 1 if i=1, and is at least 2 for i>1 (since p≥3). We thus get

(1+p)pn=1+pn+1+r⁢pn+2,r∈ℤ

Setting n=k-1 gives (1+p)pk-1≡1(pk); setting n=k-2 gives (1+p)pk-2≡1+pk-1≢1(pk). ∎

Lemma 4.

For k≥3, 5 has exact order 2k-2 in the multiplicative group (Z/2k⁢Z)× (which has order 2k-1). Additionally, 52k-3≢-1(2k).

Proof.

The proof of this lemma is essentially identical to the proof of the preceding lemma. Again by the binomial theorem,

52n=(1+22)2n=∑i=12n(2ni)⁢22⁢i

Then

ord2⁡((2ni)⁢2i)=n+2⁢i-ord2⁡(i)

Now, 2⁢i-ord2⁡(i) is 2 if i=1, and is at least 3 for i>1. We thus get

52n=1+2n+2+r⁢2n+3,r∈ℤ

Setting n=k-2 gives 52k-2≡1(2k); setting n=k-3 gives 52k-3≡1+2k-1≢±1(2k). (Note that 1+2k-1≢-1 since k≥3). ∎

References

Title structure of (ℤ/n⁢ℤ)× as an abelian group
Canonical name StructureOfmathbbZnmathbbZtimesAsAnAbelianGroup
Date of creation 2013-03-22 18:42:40
Last modified on 2013-03-22 18:42:40
Owner rm50 (10146)
Last modified by rm50 (10146)
Numerical id 4
Author rm50 (10146)
Entry type Theorem
Classification msc 20A05
Classification msc 20E36
Classification msc 20E34