Wolstenholme’s theorem


We want to show first that the harmonic numberMathworldPlanetmath

Hn=: 1+12+13+…+1n=∫011-xn1-xdx

is never an integer (n>1).

Denote by p the greatest prime numberMathworldPlanetmath not exceeding n.  By Bertrand’s postulate there is a prime q with  p<q<2⁢p.  Therefore we have  n<2⁢p.  If Hn were an integer, then the sum

n!⁢Hn=∑i=1nn!i

had to be divisible by p.  However its addend n!p is not divisible by p but all other addends are, whence the sum cannot be divisible by p.  The contradictory situation means that Hn is not integer when  n>1.

Theorem (Wolstenholme).  If p is a prime number greater than 3, then the numerator of the harmonic number

Hp-1= 1+12+13+…+1p-1

is always divisible by p2.

Proof.  Consider the polynomialPlanetmathPlanetmath

f(x)=:(x-1)(x-2)⋯(x-p+1).

One has

f⁢(0)=(p-1)!=f⁢(p) (1)

and

f⁢(x)=xp-1+a1⁢xp-2+a2⁢xp-3+…+ap-2⁢x+(p-1)! (2)

where a1,a2,…,ap-2 are integers.  Because 1, 2,…,p-1 form a set of all modulo p incongruent roots of the Fermat’s congruenceMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath (http://planetmath.org/FermatsTheorem)  xp-1≡1(modp),  one may write the identical congruence

xp-1-1≡xp-1+a1⁢xp-2+a2⁢xp-3+…+ap-2⁢x+(p-1)!(modp). (3)

It may be written by Wilson’s theorem  (p-1)!≡-1(modp)  as

a1⁢xp-2+a2⁢xp-3+…+ap-2⁢x≡ 0(modp), (4)

being thus true for any integer x.  From (4) one can successively infer that p divides all coefficients ai, i.e. that (4) actually is a formal congruence.

For the derivativeMathworldPlanetmath of the polynomial f⁢(x) one has

f′⁢(x)=(x-2)⁢⋯⁢(x-p+1)+…+(x-1)⁢⋯⁢(x-p+2)

and thus

f′⁢(0)=-2⋅3⁢⋯⁢(p-1)-…-1⋅2⁢⋯⁢(p-2). (5)

The Taylor seriesMathworldPlanetmath (Taylor polynomial) of f⁢(x) coincides with f⁢(x):

f⁢(x)=f⁢(0)+f′⁢(0)1!⁢x+f′′⁢(0)2!⁢x2+…+f(p-1)⁢(0)(p-1)!⁢xp-1

By (1), this equation implies

0=f′⁢(0)+f′′⁢(0)2⁢p+…+f(p-1)⁢(0)(p-1)!⁢pp-2 (6)

Since  p∣ap-3=f′′⁢(0)2,  one has  p∣f′′(0).  It then follows by (6) that  p2∣f′(0).  And since (5) divided by -(p-1)! gives

1+12+13+…+1p-1=-f′⁢(0)(p-1)!,

the assertion has been proved.

References

  • 1 L. Kuipers: “Der Wolstenholmesche Satz”.  – Elemente der Mathematik 35 (1980).
Title Wolstenholme’s theorem
Canonical name WolstenholmesTheorem
Date of creation 2013-03-22 19:14:06
Last modified on 2013-03-22 19:14:06
Owner pahio (2872)
Last modified by pahio (2872)
Numerical id 10
Author pahio (2872)
Entry type Theorem
Classification msc 11C08
Classification msc 11A07
Related topic HarmonicNumber