You are here
Home ›$Y$ is compact if and only if every open cover of $Y$ has a finite subcover
Primary tabs
is compact if and only if every open cover of has a finite subcover
Theorem.
Let be a topological space and a subset of . Then the following
statements are equivalent.
1. is compact as a subset of .
2. Every open cover of (with open sets in ) has a finite subcover.
Proof. Suppose is compact, and is an arbitrary open cover of , where are open sets in . Then is a collection of open sets in with union . Since is compact, there is a finite subset such that . Now , so is finite open cover of .
Conversely, suppose every open cover of has a finite subcover, and is an arbitrary collection of open sets (in ) with union . By the definition of the subspace topology, each is of the form for some open set in . Now , so is a cover of by open sets in . By assumption, it has a finite subcover . It follows that covers , and is compact.
The above proof follows the proof given in [1].
References
- 1 B.Ikenaga, Notes on Topology, August 16, 2000, available online http://www.millersv.edu/ bikenaga/topology/topnote.html.
Mathematics Subject Classification
54D30 Compactness- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new question: Sorry to steal a few minutes of your time for this question, but i honestly don't know what else to do. by Whrazithar
new question: equality of the determinants of submatrices of an orthogonal matrix by ismayli
Jun 11
new correction: Typo by suitangi
Jun 2
new question: Creating another set with same cardinality. by hkkass
Jun 1
new image: ProblemOneRevised by unlord
new Education: Chapter II by rspuzio
May 31
new collection: The Calculus by Davis and Brenke by rspuzio
new question: Proofs by weixifan
new question: Summation Integration Question by trevor.nickle
May 27
new correction: typo+finite measure hypothesis by Filipe


