bounds on
This article shows that
and thus that the function
is bounded above and below.
Definition 1
If is an integer, write where the are distinct primes. Then
Lemma 1
Proof. Note that the number of multiples of is simply . But that does not result in since some of those numbers may have additional factors of . So divide each by ; then clearly
The result follows inductively. Note that the sum is actually finite.
Lemma 2
If , all distinct, then .
Proof. Consider . Choose such that ; it suffices to show .
Now, in general, if , then or . So the sum above has at most terms (since ), each of which is either or , and thus .
Theorem 1
(Chebyshev) If
Proof. Choose such that , and write . Each by the preceding lemma, and there are at most terms on the right-hand side. Thus
Summing from to , we get
But since , so
so and thus
Theorem 2
(Chebyshev)
Proof. Note that if is prime, , then divides since occurs in the numerator but not in the denominator. Thus divides as well, and thus
and therefore
Taking logs, we get
Let . Then
Then
Note that is monotonically increasing, so if we choose with , then
Title | bounds on |
---|---|
Canonical name | BoundsOnpin |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 16:23:51 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 16:23:51 |
Owner | rm50 (10146) |
Last modified by | rm50 (10146) |
Numerical id | 4 |
Author | rm50 (10146) |
Entry type | Theorem |
Classification | msc 11A41 |