You are here
Home ›conjugate diameters of ellipse
Primary tabs
conjugate diameters of ellipse
with the family of parallel lines
| (1) |
having the common slope ; the number being a parameter. Substituting the expression (1) of to the equation of the ellipse, we get the quadratic equation
| (2) |
determining the abscissas of the intersection points and . The midpoint of the chord of the ellipse is determined by the abscissa , which is the arithmetic mean of the abscissas of and , i.e. the roots of (2). Using the well-known properties of quadratic equation, we get
The ordinate of the midpoint of the chord satisfies
Eliminating the parameter from the two last equations gives us
| (3) |
This equation says that the point is situated on the line , which passes through the origin, the centre of the ellipse. So we have the
Theorem 1. The diameter of ellipse, i.e. the bisector of the parallel chords of an ellipse, is a line passing through the centre of the ellipse.
We see from the last equation, that the slope of the diameter which bisects the chords with the slope is ; accordingly one has the symmetric equation
between and . From it one can infer that, conversely, the diameter with the slope bisects all chords which have the slope . If we have two diameters of the ellipse, each one bisecting the chords parallel to the other, then these chords are conjugate diameters of each other. Apparently, the major axis and the minor axis are a pair of conjugate diameters.
If the line (1) especially is a tangent of the ellipse, then the points and and the midpoint coincide, and thus the equation (3) gives the slope of the tangent:
So we may write the equation of the tangent
of the ellipse. This can be simplified to the well-memorable form
where is the tangency point on the ellipse. One has also the
Theorem 2. The tangent of ellipse passing through an endpoint of a diameter is parallel to the conjugate diameter.
Notes. The sum of squares of any pair of conjugate radii is equal to . The ellipse has only one pair of equally long conjugate diameters, viz. the ones lying on the diagonals of the rectangle . In the coordinate system with coordinate axes along a pair of conjugate radii , the equation of the ellipse reads .
References
- 1 Lauri Pimiä: Analyyttinen geometria. Werner Söderström Osakeyhtiö, Porvoo and Helsinki (1958).
Mathematics Subject Classification
51N20 Euclidean analytic geometry- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new question: pure subgroups by lvoyster
new correction: Typo in M\"obius function? by Aleph Zero
new collection: analytic number theory by Aleph Zero
May 20
new question: Taylor's Series Query! by unlord
new question: Laplace transform by J
new question: Residue Calculus by J
May 19
new Education: Project: PlanetMath Outlines Series by unlord
May 17
new image: sinx_approx.png by jeremyboden
new image: approximation_to_sinx by jeremyboden
new image: approximation_to_sinx by jeremyboden



Comments
Isn't It Conjugate vs. Transverse?
Given the two principal axes, x and y, isn't it just the
north-south y-axis is the conjugate axis, while the east-west, *perpendicular* x-axis is the transverse axis? See
http://books.google.com/books?id=Uk4wAAAAMAAJ&pg=RA1-PA381&zoom=3&sig=3Q...
http://books.google.com/books?id=OHsLAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA182&zoom=3&sig=_N9YWB...
~Kaimbridge~
Re: Isn't It Conjugate vs. Transverse?
The transverse axis and the conjugate axis concern only the hyperbola; the former is the line segment connecting the vertices. See http://planetmath/encyclopedia/Hyperbola.html.
Jussi
Re: Isn't It Conjugate vs. Transverse?
The transverse axis and the conjugate axis concern only the hyperbola; the former is the line segment connecting the vertices. See http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/Hyperbola.html. (I corrected the URL.)
Jussi
Re: Isn't It Conjugate vs. Transverse?
Excuse, the following is the _correct_ URL:
http://planetmath/encyclopedia/Hyperbola2.html.
Jussi
Re: Isn't It Conjugate vs. Transverse?
Oh excuse still, it is
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/Hyperbola2.html.
Re: Isn't It Conjugate vs. Transverse?
But what about the sources I noted? They both are talking about ellipses, not hyperbolae *AND* when talking about great circle delineation, you are dealing with a transverse graticule (i.e, the polar vertex is "pulled down" to the equator). See
http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/nima/nug/gloss_t.html
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/5b/Graticule_Perspectives.PNG
~Kaimbridge~
Re: Isn't It Conjugate vs. Transverse?
Dear Kaimbridge,
Maybe on your speciality (geodesy?), those terms are as you say. In mathematics, we speak only of the transverse axis and the conjugate axis of a hyperbola; see also in Wiki
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjugate_axis.
Wolfram (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/) doesn't know tose terms.
Best regards,
Jussi
Re: Isn't It Conjugate vs. Transverse?
P. S. -- As for ellipse, one speaks of major and minor (semi)axes.