You are here
Home ›consequence operator determined by a class of subsets
Primary tabs
consequence operator determined by a class of subsets
Theorem 1.
Let be a set and let be a subset of . The the mapping defined as is a consequence operator.
Proof.
We need to check that satisfies the defining properties.
Property 2: For every element of such that , it also is the case that because an intersection of a family of sets is a subset of any member of the family. In other words (or rather, symbols),
hence . By the first property proven above, so . Thus, .
Property 3: Let and be two subsets of such that . Then if, for some other subset of , we have , it follows that . Hence,
so .
∎
Type of Math Object:
Theorem
Major Section:
Reference
Parent:
Groups audience:
Mathematics Subject Classification
03G25 Other algebras related to logic03G10 Lattices and related structures
03B22 Abstract deductive systems
- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
Jun 15
new question: Sorry to steal a few minutes of your time for this question, but i honestly don't know what else to do. by Whrazithar
new question: equality of the determinants of submatrices of an orthogonal matrix by ismayli
Jun 11
new correction: Typo by suitangi
Jun 2
new question: Creating another set with same cardinality. by hkkass
Jun 1
new image: ProblemOneRevised by unlord
new Education: Chapter II by rspuzio
May 31
new collection: The Calculus by Davis and Brenke by rspuzio
new question: Proofs by weixifan
new question: Summation Integration Question by trevor.nickle
May 27
new correction: typo+finite measure hypothesis by Filipe
new question: Sorry to steal a few minutes of your time for this question, but i honestly don't know what else to do. by Whrazithar
new question: equality of the determinants of submatrices of an orthogonal matrix by ismayli
Jun 11
new correction: Typo by suitangi
Jun 2
new question: Creating another set with same cardinality. by hkkass
Jun 1
new image: ProblemOneRevised by unlord
new Education: Chapter II by rspuzio
May 31
new collection: The Calculus by Davis and Brenke by rspuzio
new question: Proofs by weixifan
new question: Summation Integration Question by trevor.nickle
May 27
new correction: typo+finite measure hypothesis by Filipe


