corner of a ring


Does there exist a subset S of a ring R which is a ring with a multiplicative identityPlanetmathPlanetmath, but not a subring of R?

Let R be a ring without the assumptionPlanetmathPlanetmath that R has a multiplicative identity. Further, assume that e is an idempotentPlanetmathPlanetmath of R. Then the subset of the form e⁢R⁢e is called a corner of the ring R.

It’s not hard to see that e⁢R⁢e is a ring with e as its multiplicative identity:

  1. 1.

    e⁢a⁢e+e⁢b⁢e=e⁢(a+b)⁢e∈e⁢R⁢e,

  2. 2.

    0=e⁢0⁢e∈e⁢R⁢e,

  3. 3.

    e⁢(-a)⁢e is the additive inverse of e⁢a⁢e in e⁢R⁢e,

  4. 4.

    (e⁢a⁢e)⁢(e⁢b⁢e)=e⁢(a⁢e⁢b)⁢e∈e⁢R⁢e, and

  5. 5.

    e=e⁢e=e⁢e⁢e∈e⁢R⁢e, with e⁢(e⁢a⁢e)=e⁢a⁢e=(e⁢a⁢e)⁢e, for any e⁢a⁢e∈e⁢R⁢e.

If R has no multiplicative identity, then any corner of R is a proper subsetMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath of R which is a ring and not a subring of R. If R has 1 as its multiplicative identity and if e≠1 is an idempotent, then the e⁢R⁢e is not a subring of R as they don’t share the same multiplicative identity. In this case, the corner e⁢R⁢e is said to be proper. If we set f=1-e, then f⁢R⁢f is also a proper corner of R.

Remark. If R has 1 with e≠1 an idempotent. Then corners S=e⁢R⁢e and T=f⁢R⁢f, where f=1-e, are direct summandsMathworldPlanetmath (as modules over ℤ) of R via a Peirce decompositionMathworldPlanetmath.

References

  • 1 I. Kaplansky, Rings of Operators, W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, 1968.
Title corner of a ring
Canonical name CornerOfARing
Date of creation 2013-03-22 15:43:56
Last modified on 2013-03-22 15:43:56
Owner CWoo (3771)
Last modified by CWoo (3771)
Numerical id 9
Author CWoo (3771)
Entry type Definition
Classification msc 16S99
Related topic UnityOfSubring