counter-example to Tonelli’s theorem


The following observation demonstrates the necessity of the σ-finite assumptionPlanetmathPlanetmath in Tonelli’s and Fubini’s theorem. Let X denote the closed unit interval [0,1] equipped with Lebesgue measureMathworldPlanetmath and Y the same set, but this time equipped with counting measure ν. Let

f(x,y)={1 if x=y,0 otherwise.

Observe that

Y(Xf(x,y)𝑑μ(x))𝑑ν(y)=0,

while

X(Yf(x,y)𝑑ν(y))𝑑μ(x)=1.

The iterated integrals do not give the same value, this despite the fact that the integrand is a non-negative function.

Also observe that there does not exist a simple functionMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath on X×Y that is dominated by f. Hence,

X×Yf(x,y)d(μ(x)×ν(y)=0.

Therefore, the integrand is L1 integrable relative to the product measureMathworldPlanetmath. However, as we observed above, the iterated integrals do not agree. This observation illustrates the need for the σ-finite assumption for Fubini’s theorem.

Title counter-example to Tonelli’s theorem
Canonical name CounterexampleToTonellisTheorem
Date of creation 2013-03-22 18:16:36
Last modified on 2013-03-22 18:16:36
Owner rmilson (146)
Last modified by rmilson (146)
Numerical id 4
Author rmilson (146)
Entry type Example
Classification msc 28A35