criteria for a poset to be a complete lattice


PropositionPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath. Let L be a poset. Then the following are equivalentMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath.

  1. 1.
  2. 2.

    for every subset A of L, ⋁A exists.

  3. 3.

    for every finite subset F of L and every directed setMathworldPlanetmath D of L, ⋁F and ⋁D exist.

Proof.

ImplicationsMathworldPlanetmath 1.⇒2.⇒3. are clear. We will show 3.⇒2.⇒1.

(3.⇒2.) If A=∅, then ⋁A=0 by definition. So assume A be a non-empty subset of L. Let A′ be the set of all finite subsets of A and B={⋁F∣F∈A′}. By assumptionPlanetmathPlanetmath, B is well-defined and A⊆B. Next, let B′ be the set of all directed subsets of B, and C={⋁D∣D∈B′}. By assumption again, C is well-defined and B⊆C. Now, every chain in C has a maximal elementMathworldPlanetmath in C (since a chain is a directed set), C itself has a maximal element d by Zorn’s Lemma. We will show that d is the least upper boundMathworldPlanetmath of elments of A. It is clear that each a∈A is bounded above by d (A⊆B⊆C). If t is an upper bound of elements of A, then it is an upper bound of elements of B, and hence an upper bound of elements of C, which means d≤t.

(2.⇒1.) By assumption ⋁∅ exists (=0), so that ⋀L=0. Now suppose A is a proper subsetMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath of L. We want to show that ⋀A exists. If A=∅, then ⋀A=⋁L=1 by definition of an arbitrary meet over the empty setMathworldPlanetmath. So assume A≠∅. Let A′ be the set of lower bounds of A: A′={x∈L∣x≤a⁢ for all ⁢a∈A} and let b=⋁A′, the least upper bound of A′. b exists by assumption. Since A is a set of upper bounds of A′, b≤a for all a∈A. This means that b is a lower bound of elements of A, or b∈A′. If x is any lower bound of elements of A, then x≤b, since x is bounded above by b (b=⋁A′). This shows that ⋀A exists and is equal to b. ∎

Remarks.

  • •

    Dually, a poset is a complete lattice iff every subset has an infimumMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath iff infimum exists for every finite subset and every directed subset.

  • •

    The above proposition shows, for example, that every closure system is a complete lattice.

Title criteria for a poset to be a complete lattice
Canonical name CriteriaForAPosetToBeACompleteLattice
Date of creation 2013-03-22 16:37:53
Last modified on 2013-03-22 16:37:53
Owner CWoo (3771)
Last modified by CWoo (3771)
Numerical id 7
Author CWoo (3771)
Entry type Theorem
Classification msc 06B23
Classification msc 03G10
Related topic MeetContinuous
Related topic IntersectionStructure