## You are here

Homede Morgan's laws for sets (proof)

## Primary tabs

# de Morgan’s laws for sets (proof)

Let $X$ be a set with subsets $A_{i}\subset X$ for $i\in I$, where $I$ is an arbitrary index-set. In other words, $I$ can be finite, countable, or uncountable. We first show that

$\displaystyle\displaystyle\big(\cup_{{i\in I}}A_{i}\big)^{{\prime}}$ | $\displaystyle=$ | $\displaystyle\cap_{{i\in I}}A_{i}^{{\prime}},$ |

where $A^{{\prime}}$ denotes the complement of $A$.

Let us define $S=\big(\cup_{{i\in I}}A_{i}\big)^{{\prime}}$ and $T=\cap_{{i\in I}}A_{i}^{{\prime}}$. To establish the equality $S=T$, we shall use a standard argument for proving equalities in set theory. Namely, we show that $S\subset T$ and $T\subset S$. For the first claim, suppose $x$ is an element in $S$. Then $x\notin\cup_{{i\in I}}A_{i}$, so $x\notin A_{i}$ for any $i\in I$. Hence $x\in A_{i}^{{\prime}}$ for all $i\in I$, and $x\in\cap_{{i\in I}}A_{i}^{{\prime}}=T$. Conversely, suppose $x$ is an element in $T=\cap_{{i\in I}}A_{i}^{{\prime}}$. Then $x\in A_{i}^{{\prime}}$ for all $i\in I$. Hence $x\notin A_{i}$ for any $i\in I$, so $x\notin\cup_{{i\in I}}A_{i}$, and $x\in S$.

The second claim,

$\displaystyle\big(\cap_{{i\in I}}A_{i}\big)^{{\prime}}$ | $\displaystyle=$ | $\displaystyle\cup_{{i\in I}}A_{i}^{{\prime}},$ |

follows by applying the first claim to the sets $A_{i}^{{\prime}}$.

## Mathematics Subject Classification

03E30*no label found*

- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)

- Other useful stuff

## Recent Activity

new question: Lorenz system by David Bankom

Oct 19

new correction: examples and OEIS sequences by fizzie

Oct 13

new correction: Define Galois correspondence by porton

Oct 7

new correction: Closure properties on languages: DCFL not closed under reversal by babou

new correction: DCFLs are not closed under reversal by petey

Oct 2

new correction: Many corrections by Smarandache

Sep 28

new question: how to contest an entry? by zorba

new question: simple question by parag

Sep 26

new question: Latent variable by adam_reith