PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people.
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: High Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
$2^{\omega(n)} \le \tau(n) \le 2^{\Omega(n)}$ (Theorem)

Throughout this entry, $ \omega$, $ \tau$, and $ \Omega$ denote the number of distinct prime factors function, the divisor function, and the number of (nondistinct) prime factors function, respectively.

Theorem   For any positive integer $ n$, $ 2^{\omega(n)} \le \tau(n) \le 2^{\Omega(n)}$.
Proof. Note that $ 2^{\omega(n)}$, $ \tau(n)$, and $ 2^{\Omega(n)}$ are multiplicative. Also note that, for any positive integer $ n$, the numbers $ 2^{\omega(n)}$, $ \tau(n)$, and $ 2^{\Omega(n)}$ are positive integers. Therefore, it will suffice to prove the inequality for prime powers.

Let $ p$ be a prime and $ k$ be a positive integer. Thus:

\begin{displaymath}\begin{array}{rl} \displaystyle 2^{\omega(p^k)} & =2 \ \ ... ... =k+1 \ \ \displaystyle 2^{\Omega(p^k)} & = 2^k \end{array}\end{displaymath}

Hence, $ 2^{\omega(p^k)} \le \tau(p^k) \le 2^{\Omega(p^k)}$. It follows that $ 2^{\omega(n)} \le \tau(n) \le 2^{\Omega(n)}$. $ \qedsymbol$

This theorem has an obvious corollary.

Corollary   For any squarefree positive integer $ n$, $ 2^{\omega(n)}=\tau(n)=2^{\Omega(n)}$.



"$2^{\omega(n)} \le \tau(n) \le 2^{\Omega(n)}$" is owned by Wkbj79.
(view preamble)

View style:

See Also: number of distinct prime factors function, $\tau$ function, number of (nondistinct) prime factors function, $\displaystyle \sum_{n \le x} y^{\Omega(n)}=O\left( \frac{x(\log x)^{y-1}}{2-y} \right)$ for $1 \le y<2$

Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: squarefree, obvious, prime, inequality, numbers, multiplicative, integer, positive, divisor function, number of distinct prime factors function

This is version 11 of $2^{\omega(n)} \le \tau(n) \le 2^{\Omega(n)}$, born on 2006-07-29, modified 2008-01-01.
Object id is 8194, canonical name is 2omeganLeTaunLe2Omegan.
Accessed 1058 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC11A25 (Number theory :: Elementary number theory :: Arithmetic functions; related numbers; inversion formulas)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
[ View all 1 ]
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy
Avoiding ambiguity by hv on 2007-12-31 12:17:02
The proof starts: "Note that the three functions involved in the inequality are multiplicative." I would suggest replacing "functions" with "expressions" - on first reading, my automatic assumption was that the "functions" were \omega(n), \tau(n) and \Omega(n).

Hugo van der Sanden
[ reply | up ]
Unproven? by Mravinci on 2006-10-09 18:00:41
Why is this theorem classified as unproven? The proof provided convinces me well enough, I don't know about the rest of you.
[ reply | up ]

Interact
post | correct | update request | prove | add result | add corollary | add example | add (any)