PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: Very high Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
axiom of dependent choices (Definition)

The axiom of dependent choices (DC), or the principle of dependent choices, is the following statement:

given a set $A$ and a binary relation $R\ne \varnothing$ on $A$ such that $\ran{R}\subseteq \dom{R}$ , then there is a sequence $(a_n)_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ in $A$ such that $a_n R a_{n+1}$ .
Here, $\mathbb{N}$ is the set of all natural numbers.

The relation between DC, AC (axiom of choice), and CC (axiom of countable choice) are the following:

Proposition 1   ZF+AC implies ZF+DC.

We prove this by using one of the equivalents of AC: Zorn's lemma. For this proof, we define $\seg{n}:=\lbrace m\in \mathbb{N} \mid m\le n\rbrace$ , the initial segment of $\mathbb{N}$ with the greatest element $n$ . Before starting the proof, we need a fact about initial segments:

Lemma 1   The union of initial segments of $\mathbb{N}$ is either $\mathbb{N}$ or an initial segment.
Proof. Let $S$ be a set of initial segments of $\mathbb{N}$ . If $s:=\bigcup S \ne \mathbb{N}$ , then $B:=\mathbb{N}-S\ne \varnothing$ , so $B$ has a least element $r$ . As a result, none of $i\in \seg{r-1}$ is in $B$ , and $\seg{r-1}\subseteq s$ . If some $m \ge r$ is in $s$ , then there is an initial segment $\seg{n} \in S$ with $m\in \seg{n}$ , so that $r\in \seg{m} \subseteq \seg{n} \subseteq s$ , contradicting $r\in B$ . $ \qedsymbol$

Remark. The fact that $B$ in the proof above has a least element is a direct result of ZF, so the well-ordering principle (and hence AC) is not needed.

We are now ready for the proof of proposition 1.

Proof. Let $R$ be a non-empty binary relation on a set $A$ (of course non-empty). We want to find a function $f:\mathbb{N}\to \dom{R}$ such that $f(n) R f(n+1)$ .

Let $P$ be the set of all partial functions $f:\mathbb{N}\Rightarrow \dom{R}$ such that $\dom{f}$ is either an initial segment of $\mathbb{N}$ , or $\mathbb{N}$ itself, such that $f(n) R f(n+1)$ , whenever $n,n+1\in \dom{f}$ . Since $R\ne \varnothing$ , some $(a,b)\in R$ . Additionally, $b\in \ran{R}\subseteq \dom{R}$ . Define function $g:\lbrace 1,2\rbrace \to \dom{R}$ by $g(1)=a$ and $g(2)=b$ . Then $g(1) R g(2)$ , so that $g\in P$ , or $P$ is non-empty.

Partial order $P$ by inclusion so it is a poset. Let $C$ be a chain in $P$ , then $h:=\bigcup C$ is a partial function from $\mathbb{N}$ to $A$ . Since $\dom{h}$ is the union of initial segments or $\mathbb{N}$ , $\dom{h}$ itself is either an initial segment or $\mathbb{N}$ by Lemma 1.

Now, suppose $m,m+1\in \dom{h}$ , then $m+1\in \dom{s}$ for some $s\in C$ , so $m\in \dom{s}$ as well. Therefore $s(m) R s(m+1)$ . Since $h(i) = s(i)$ for any $i\in \dom{s}$ , we see that $h(m) R h(m+1)$ . This shows that $h \in P$ , or that $C$ has an upper bound in $P$ .

By Zorn's lemma, $P$ has a maximal element $f$ . We claim that $f$ is a total function. If not, then $\dom{f}=\lbrace 1,\ldots, n\rbrace$ for some $n$ . Since $f(n)\in \dom{R}$ , there is some $d\in \ran{R}$ such that $f(n) R d$ . Define a partial function $g: \mathbb{N}\Rightarrow \dom{R}$ such that $\dom{g}=\lbrace 1,\ldots, n+1\rbrace$ , and $g(i)=f(i)$ for all $i=1,\ldots, n$ , and $g(n+1)=b$ . So $g\ne f$ extends $f$ , contradicting the maximality of $f$ . Hence, $f$ is a total function, and we are done. $ \qedsymbol$

Proposition 2   ZF+DC implies ZF+CC.
Proof. Let $C$ be a countable set of non-empty sets. We assume that $C$ is countably infinite, for the finite case can be proved using ZF alone, and is left for the reader.

Since there is a bijection $\phi: C\to \mathbb{N}$ , index each element in $C$ by its image in $\mathbb{N}$ , so that $C=\lbrace A_i\mid i\in \mathbb{N}\rbrace$ . Let $A:=\bigcup C$ . We want to find a function $f:C\to A$ such that $f(A_i)\in A_i$ for every $i\in \mathbb{N}$ .

Define a binary relation $R$ on $A$ as follows: $a R b$ iff there is an $i\in \mathbb{N}$ such that $a \in A_i$ and $b\in A_{i+1}$ . Since each $A_i\ne \varnothing$ , $R\ne \varnothing$ . Furthermore, if $b\in \ran{R}$ , then $b\in A_{i+1}$ for some $i\in \mathbb{N}$ . Pick any $c\in A_{i+2}$ (since $A_{i+2}\ne \varnothing$ ), so that $b R c$ , and therefore $b\in \dom{R}$ . This shows that $\ran{R}\subseteq \dom{R}$ .

By DC, there is a function $g:\mathbb{N}\to \dom{R}$ such that $g(i) R g(i+1)$ for every $i\in \mathbb{N}$ . Now, $g(1)\in A_j$ for some $j\in \mathbb{N}$ . Define a function $h:\mathbb{N}\to A$ as follows, for each $i\in \seg{j-1}$ , pick $a_i\in A_i$ and set $h(i):=a_i$ (this can be done by induction), and for $i\ge j$ , set $h(i):=g(j-i+1)$ (arithmetic of finite cardinals is possible in ZF). Then $h(i)\in A_i$ for all $i\in \mathbb{N}$ .

Finally, define $f:C\to A$ as follows: for each $A_i\in C$ , set $f(A_i):=h(i)$ . Then $f$ has the desired property $f(A_i)\in A_i$ , and the proof is complete. $ \qedsymbol$

However, the converses of both of these implications are false. Jensen proved the independence of DC from ZF+CC, and Mostowski and Jech proved the independence of AC from ZF+DC. In fact, it was shown that the weaker version of AC, which states that every set with cardinality at most $\aleph_1$ has a choice function, is independent from ZF+DC.

Remark. DC is related to Baire spaces in point-set topology. It can be shown that DC is equivalent to each of the following statements in ZF:

Bibliography

1
T. Jech, Interdependence of weakened forms of the axiom of choice, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae 7, pp. 359-371, (1966).
2
R. B. Jensen Independence of the axiom of dependent choices from the countable axiom of choice (abstract), Jour. Symbolic Logic 31, 294, (1966).
3
A. Levy, Basic Set Theory, Dover Publications Inc., (2002).
4
A. Mostowski On the principle of dependent choices, Fund. Math. 35, pp 127-130 (1948).




"axiom of dependent choices" is owned by CWoo. [ full author list (2) ]
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:

Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: product topology, Hausdorff spaces, compact, product, pseudometric, induced, pseudometric space, topology, Baire spaces, independent, choice function, cardinality, states, implications, converses, complete, property, cardinals, arithmetic, induction, iff, image, element, index, bijection, finite, countably infinite, countable, total function, maximal element, upper bound, chain, poset, inclusion, partial order, partial functions, function, proposition, well-ordering principle, least element, union, greatest element, initial segment, proof, Zorn's lemma, equivalents, implies, ZF, axiom of countable choice, axiom of choice, relation, natural numbers, sequence, binary relation
There is 1 reference to this entry.

This is version 4 of axiom of dependent choices, born on 2009-01-26, modified 2009-01-27.
Object id is 11571, canonical name is AxiomOfDependentChoices.
Accessed 374 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC03E25 (Mathematical logic and foundations :: Set theory :: Axiom of choice and related propositions)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy

No messages.

Interact
post | correct | update request | add derivation | add example | add (any)